Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilIveysSon
Im a newbie in posting but im a long time lurker.
I read all your post in here and you jump on anything/thread that is related to Harrington. Either your Harrington, Robertie gimmick account or friends of them.
If you lurk that much you should know the below:
Once more, I am neither Danny or Bill. I know both, one better then the other. I have not spoken to either in a while, and they have no idea who Amulet is, nor do I think they care. I know many of the authors at 2+2 and give praise and criticize. I have criticized friends books here several times. I am always anonymous, obviously Amulet is not my name. I try to offer my opinions fairly to those considering purchasing books. They are my opinions, everyone is free to disagree.
I thought HOH was terrific when it came out. I thought HOC was good, not great. In my opinion it is one of the two most complete NL books, Winning Strategies for No-Limit Hold'em, is the other. FYI - I don't think HOC is a great tool for 6 max. I also don't think there is a great 6 max book on the market.
I don't think there is a great NL book period. I do think there are great poker books.
I have no idea what you think the benefits of "brown nosing" are. I don't think there are benefits.
When I wrote:
[QUOTE =]
Poker has changed for years. The recent changes may be happening somewhat quicker, but are nothing new.
Harrington is a terrific games player, poker, backgammon, chess, all which have undergone huge changes several times during his playing career.
He and Robertie are smart and write well together. He has played online for several years.
I am interested in seeing what they turn out.
[/QUOTE]
That was my opinion. I thought it would be helpful to the OP.
If you feel people shouldn't be excited about a book, or disagree with me write that. However, you assumptions about me and my motives are completely incorrect.
The book form should be about the quality of books, not about the posters who contribute.
.