Quote:
Originally Posted by chinz
You are underestimating how easy it is to get action at NL50 HU. You can pretty much be 2-6 tabling vs. fish nonstop playing only on 2 networks. So if you are US player you can just play on PS+FTP and still get decent amount of action.
Still $100/h would require maintaining a really good winrate while regularly playing 3-4 different opponents. It's really far from easy and most of the people capable of doing it would probably maximize their hourly doing something else (eg. bumhunting small/midstakes)...
But anyway, if somebody tries to achieve $100/h winrate at NL50, multitabling HU is probably the most reasonable way to do it.
My lifetime winrate at 6max at 200nl is over 4ptbb over 3 years
I play 7-12 tables and most of the time i have 2-3 hu tables starting vs weak regs or fish
Everytime i have tried to play 6-8 tables of nl50 hu(fun-bored-challenge), i have gotten crushed by having too many weird different players, with too many different stack sizes and having a bunch of weird weak regs sit with me and play super high variance non thinking aggro hu.
It would be a very hard feat..
i feel that the only way this is doable in USD $ would be to play 16-20 tables on a site with 60%+ rb and rakeraces.. even then it would be quite close.. probably would end up getting 90$ an hour. (have to keep 3ptbb+ over 500k hands playing too many tables)