Quote:
Originally Posted by poker-hero
Hi,
I have started reading Vol1 and Vol2 but not from the beginning to the end...
I started picking up several parts I am particularly interested in.
So at the moment, I am reading vol 2 / p.70 about the sizing on turn (GGOP vs % of the pot).
and it is said that if we are in PvBC spot, then GGOP is better.
My question : in practice (no toy game, but real poker hands), how could be determine a spot is PvBC?
After thinking about it, I thought about these requirements :
-Hero's range Equity > 80% vs V's range equity.
-static board, (NO draw), but this second condition is generally induced by the first one (when there's a draw, Villain's range has generally more than 20% equity on turn).
Are these 2 requirements OK to determine a PvBC spot?
Should we change these 2 conditions a bit (lower the equity requirement or 1 draw accepted for example)?
Do we need to take something else into accounts?
What would the requirements be for a flop spot to be PvBC?
What would the requirements be for a river spot to be PvBC?
I now think the above requirements are not good.
What about this criteria : number of hero's combos >= overpair (so this includes overpairs, 2 pairs, sets, trips, monsters...) divided by number of Villain's combos >= overpair
After studying a few Turn spots, I'd say when this metric is above 10 (?), then it's a PvBC spot.
Is that metric enough to determine a PvBC turn spot?
Do you think 10 is a right threshold?
What about the flop and river spots? Same metric? Same threshold?