and


?????

come back when you have played 50k+ hands

yes mam

30/8 isn't a great strategy to beat poker, sure you'll beable to beat lowerstakes like this but if you move upto higher limits you'll be easily exploitable.

Also your number of hands played is pretty meaningless and the graph is pretty pointless given the number of hands.

You can be a winning player over 5m hands and have a 100k hand breakeven run.

To put it bluntly, no. Your winrate is fantastic, but not sustainable. What Number1Hater meant is that your sample is about 49,600 hands away from being able to tell us much about your potential as a poker player. You only get any particular pocket pair once in 220 hands. In sample of 463 hands, you might have gotten pocket aces several times or none, which will have a huge impact upon your winrate over such a tiny, insignificant sample.

But I'm going to treat your stats as if your sample were meaningful, which, again, it's not; it's waaaay, way, way too small. Let's say you have the same numbers @ 10K hands, though. I still couldn't conclude much about whether or not you're a winning player, but I could conclude some things about your playing style.

VPiP%: 30% is almost certainly too high. You're playing some junk hands. ~18% is often considered an ideal starting point (textbook TAG); as you improve, you add hands and eventually you might be skillful enough to play 30% of hands.

PFR: 8% is way too low for someone with 30% VPiP. Tbh, it's fish stats, generally speaking. Textbook TAG would be more like 15%. You don't want more than a few percentage points between your VPiP and your PFR. I'm more passive than I should be probably and when I'm playing well @ 6-max, my stats are usually 23/18 and sometimes 23/17, which is considered a wide gap by most.

Post Flop AF: 2.5 isn't too bad. If you were playing less hands (stronger range), you would probably be closer to AF=3, which is closer to ideal imo.

Steal: 20% is okay, generally speaking. Anything between 20%-30% (sometimes more, but rare), dependent upon table conditions is winning poker.

Check/Raise: 2.2% is too low. HEM's leakbuster series found that a C/R ~10% maximizes winrate.

Went to SD/Won @ SD: Perfectly reasonable stats imo. Don't remember what HEM recommends, but I think you're in acceptable ranges. A higher SD winrate couldn't hurt though.

3bet PF: Your range is pretty much QQ+/AK. Too narrow. Good players will hammer you once they catch on.

Called preflop raise: Too high by about 400% I think. Calling raises isn't winning poker, generally speaking.

Folded to 3-bet preflop: Waaaaay too low. You're playing in bloated pots with weak hands, probably out of position oftentimes.

Cbet/Fold to cbet: Probably about right.

2.5c per hand is pretty good. id say keep going.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/32...thread-361070/