i always thought higher avg pot, more money they willing to put... also means alot of loose players in this table which is good for tight player to get money from them but i heard higher flop % is better cos of many fishes. so not sure if which one is better
Avg pot size can be misleading. Sometimes there will be a few cooler hands in a row, sometimes a random fish will join and start shoving pre with full stacks. And people will keep folding before they begin calling him light and then he either builds a stack or goes busto and tries another table. I like 65% people per flop better because it usually means there going to be a lot of limping and one or two mega whales who will be easy to play post flop.
I wouldn't base my decision to play a game on neither of those things. I would sit down at the table and take a look around. I try to figure out where the worst player(s) are seated. I want to have position on them. If I can't have that, at least I want to have position on the loosest player(s) at the table. Many other considerations obviously apply as well. The point is that a good table in one seat can be a bad table in another. And that the stats you posted tell you very little about how profitable a table is going to be for you.
