Quote:
Originally Posted by sixfour
Think about how it is ever going to have a significant change over a large sample size. Say villain has got 1k hands on you and you typically play 25/20 - if you've tagged villain as not being a drooler, is he ever going to see anything significantly different than you folding pre 750 times? And if you do play a hand when he's at the table, how many times will you be doing something hugely out of line in normal play? And how many hands will you actually do something specifically against that villain?
You're just trying to take higher level concepts that have more relevance live and applying it to low level online games where villain either isn't tracking, won't notice any difference if he is, and won't appreciate subtle plays designed to exploit him in the rare occasions that they do happen as it's ****ing NL25
Yeah your right that it would probably show very marginal results in a large sample size, however poker is nowdays about the marginal advantages, isn't it?
And in case of playing in a big player pool at pokerstars, it would be more useful compared to some smaller site, wouldn't it?
But anyway, I think this isn't possible to do with HEM, so whatevss.