shooter35: general stats for tournaments/SNGs are useless, because your strategy and stats vary wildly thru the different stages of the tournament.
The one thing I can say is that you are definitely calling too much preflop: in principle raise or fold preflop except in a few situations.

adsss: These are nice results, and doesn't seem to be much wrong overall. I think you should open up quite a lot in cutoff, and probably somewhat in middle position (hijack) as well. For the rest, this seems to be doing just fine.

Fabadam thanks for the feedback and comments re SNG stats noted. So what I have done is to get a report from PT which shows a break down of stats at the different blind levels of tournaments i've been playing. Ignoring the 2/6 players games, is there anything obvious you can comment on please?

Taking your comments on calling too much on board, I can see that during lbp I am calling a lot, but I have been calling with specualtive hands like suited connectors/low pp in late position which I thought was OK?

Any comments would be much appreciated.

http://img843.imageshack.us/i/shooter35stats******

By shooter35 at 2011-04-26

Sweet. Thanks.

How wide should I open up from the hijack? 44-AA, 86s-KJs, 56s-KQs, A5s-AKs, AJ-AKo? Is this still too tight or should I lower down the one gappers to, 75s?

I posted earlier, but my samplesize was very small. I don't get to play many hands, but I've atleast logged over 10k hands now. First half of my graph is 2nl, then som 5 and 10nl, been playing mostly 25nl lately, and I'm running kinda godlike. I'm playing 2-4 tables. Any respons would be good.

Graph in bbs:

.

Graph in dollars:

.

Postitional report:

.

Overal report part one and two:

,

.


Ai!

TheAlt: You're playing too many hands/3bet too much/too aggressive from the SB, IMO.

Compare you SB stats to your BU stats. You want to be more aggressive on BU than SB. Your VPIP for SB should be about the same compared to BB.

If that's not the case, considering you've been running hot, like you said, play more hands and then we can check those stats again to see if this is a leak.

That's probably true. I raise my sb when folded to me almost 100% if the bb has a very high fold to steal, and they almost always have. I also like 3betting from the sb against people with a high steal prosentage, mostly because they seem to give me way more credit when I'm in the sb then when I'm in the bb. I don't think I've been running hot cardwise, so the pf stats are probably representative for my game. I agree that my sb stats are weird, just not sure if it's a bad thing. But it very well might be.

shooter35: There is a very important stat missing in that table: the number of hands at all those blinds levels.
I suspect that form some of them, the number of hands is very low. Which means no meaningful stats.

I will say though, that limping speculative hands is NOT generally good, especially since you are often sitting wth very shallow stacks in tournaments. You can not call any hand really, when you are sitting 30 bb or so deep: there are not sufficient implied odds to play for.

Really, tournament play is so different, where it's mostly blind stealing and re-stealing from a certain point on. Even in early blind levels in SNG you are often only 50 BB or so deep, and you cannot really call and hope to hit profitably.

Thanks again for the advice Fabadam.

Guys,
I have been playing NL10 on Stars for roughly 40k hands
The overall stats are below

At about halftime I tried to reduce cold calling a bit and became slightly more aggressive PF and also post flop.

any suggestions.?
Thx in advance

bigdog63: These stats looks reasonable, with no huge leaks.
(1) VPIP/PFR ratio is a bit too high, but you say you've already reduced cold-calling so you probably fixed that.
(2) Your WTSD% is on the high side of the range, but your W$SD% is quite high, as is your W$WSF%. It's a bit odd how these can all be high and you still are basically break-even. Perhaps you are losing relatively many big pots where you make hero calls or something like that? I note that your "fold to turn c-bet%" is very low, so maybe you are trying to catch opponents bluffing too much?
(3) Fold to 3bet% is a bit too high, but probably that's OK at NL10 where there isn't much bluffing in 3bets.

Thanks - I feel you may be right about me losing too many big ones or paying off when I should not.

Is there a good straight forward way to see this in the stats in more detail ?

I use HEM, not PT3, but there should be some way to filter for hands that fit this pattern. For example, set filters to where you call the river.

These are from the sessions I played yesterday. I play 10NL FR Rush.

Any advice? I'm new @Cash games, big experience playing HUSNG though and i don't know if my VPIP and PFR are adecuate, sometimes i think i'm playing way too loose



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Sworaven: Looks like you ran pretty bad. Still, your overall stats also look like you are playing a fairly weak-tight nitty fit-or-fold game. Low W$WSF, high W$SD, lowish c-bet%, a lot of check-folding. Also, steal more.
Still it's weird to lose so much with that style over this amount of hands.

Yeah, I ran pretty bad and a massive amount of coolers. I think it definitely affected my play. I'd be lying if I said I always played my A-game. It's frustrating because I used to be a winning player at 25NL FR (normal, not rush) and now I can't seem to win at 10NL Rush. It's true that I play a weak-tight/fit-or-fold style, especially OOP. To be honest, I posted here because I couldn't find any obvious leaks myself.

Played another 11k hands today, adjust my opening range a bit and tried to be less passive. Booked a small profit, although it was pretty swingy.

SoulAndBone: not much I can read from a single line of stats.Some observations:
(0) You don't say whether it's 6-max or FR, I assume 6-max.
(1) VPIP/PFR ratio a bit too high (21/16), should be more like 21/18 (or 18/16 if you prefer a nitty style). Limp/coldcall less, play pure value.
(2) Postflop your AF is definitely too low, which means you are too passive, and probably calling too much. Again, play pure value, raise or fold most of the time.
(3) Your W$WSF is too low, while your WTSD% is quit high, and your W$SD% is also reasonably high. This again indicates passiveness and insufficient value betting.

Sorry, forgot to say it but it was FR. Thanks for the reply, i'll take all you said into consideration

I dont have a huge sample size at the new site yet . I made some adjustments to my game , and would like a checkup , just to see if I am missing anything . Thanks .

Leroy_Jenkins45: Main observations here:
(1) VPIP/PFR ratio slightly high (coldcalling/limping a bit too much)
(2) AF quite low, while AggFreq% is high. This indicates you are doing an awful lot of calling, which can't be right unless surrounded by bluff monkeys. Also probably not value betting thin enough then.
(3) Graph looks pretty OK, better than the stats since the red line is better than I'd expect on these stats.

The calling is because alot of my new opponnents are aggrotards who make alot more betting mistakes than calling ones , so I have been cold calling with ak aq type hands sometimes against certain villian types . and also I have been calling more in position against tighter guys with scs . So my calling has went up . I will work on the thinner value bets . Thanks for your time man .

hi all my full ring stats 38/19/47 over 259 hands in FR NL 5

is that very bad?? i am currently playing NL 5 10 25

because i am a fish so i tilt around different stakes.... with only 200 bankroll

now im down around 30 .....

(1) 259 hands is nothing
(2) 38/19 is likely to be very bad.