@Olly - I called because what he did just made no sense and I had blockers etc. It doesn't take many combos of bluffs (or stuff like AQ) to make this a call anyway if his range is TT-QQ. He had QQ.
If he's flatting AA or KK there then he's making a pretty big mistake against me, if 4betting/flatting QQ & JJ that's a pretty bad mistake, especially if he jams none K/A high flops all the time. If he has stuff like 99 in his range then I'd just be widening my value range. So the information was always going to turn out pretty useful.
It can be frustrating when people do stupid **** like that. But its exactly that, stupid. they are making the mistake, they lose vs your calling range. Don't make it not a mistake by calling with A high.
It's noted now obviously, I think against a random it's quite close though tbh for the reasons I've said. Maybe it is always JJ & QQ, but I think assuming that with no sample is a pretty huge adjustment to be making.
It's a good example of level 1 thinking at the micros. "I have an overpair, how could I possibly lose in this 5bet pot?"
I've found these exploits to be what makes people so profitable at these stakes. I was a bit frustrated the other day when a few people called 3bets with 22 - 55 OOP and binked a set vs. my AA, but them calling those hands OOP to 3bets gives me instant-profits, so #yolo.
Results: $21.01 pot ($0.95 rake)
Final Board: 2 Q 4 5 J
Hero showed 3 A and won $20.06 ($9.78 net)
MP showed 9 9 and lost (-$10.28 net)
Flop call is debatable. Getting pretty good odds though, especially to the min-raise. I had 32% equity on the flop so the call is profitable (it looks like).
But this is still a huge problem for me, chasing draws I shouldn't be chasing. I'm blowing money out the wazoo because of it.
What do you guys think of this 3 barrel semi-bluff? I was going with my read that he had a FD, it was a timing tell, he took pretty long to call the turn, while on the flop he was calling within a few seconds.
Maybe a check on the turn would've been better, seeing that I have a little bit of SDV now, but maybe I got him to lay down a better pair this way.
What do you guys think of this 3 barrel semi-bluff? I was going with my read that he had a FD, it was a timing tell, he took pretty long to call the turn, while on the flop he was calling within a few seconds.
Maybe a check on the turn would've been better, seeing that I have a little bit of SDV now, but maybe I got him to lay down a better pair this way.
Any thoughts?
I personally use timing tells too but i would normally interpret that to be Tx hands more than flush hands given your bet size, so maybe the river bet folds out some Tx hands i can't see him folding any Kx, Qx hands
First time participating in this thread. Just returned to online poker in September.
[ ] Improve 4-betting line
[ ] (Will add more goals as I think of them)
4-betting line - I haven't found a line I like yet where I can include 4-bet bluffs. Currently vs preflop 3-bets: IP = fold or flat, OOP = fold or shove (<- Also for multiway pots). I'm still lost for a good flop line after I 4-bet OOP.
What do you guys think of this 3 barrel semi-bluff? I was going with my read that he had a FD, it was a timing tell, he took pretty long to call the turn, while on the flop he was calling within a few seconds.
Maybe a check on the turn would've been better, seeing that I have a little bit of SDV now, but maybe I got him to lay down a better pair this way.
Any thoughts?
I am assuming you meant 'check on the river'. You have no SDV on the turn.
You said you 'read him for a FD'. Given that read: What are you hoping to fold / get called by on the river? Why do you think villian will fold / call?
4-bet bluffing isn't something you should do often at all.
Out of the 5 most recent hands I've 4bet, only one has been a bluff (while a second has been a semi-bluff).
Preflop: Hero is CO with A 3
2 folds, Hero raises to $0.30, BTN raises to $0.80, 2 folds, Hero raises to $2.20, BTN folds
Results: $1.75 pot
Hero mucked A 3 and won $1.75 ($0.95 net)
He 3bet very quickly, made me believe it was a bluff. Had blockers to Ax as well, so it's unlikely he has a hand like AQ or something. If he did have AQ I might even be able to throw him off of it.
Then this hand which was turned into a semi-bluff.
Preflop: Hero is BB with 9 9
2 folds, CO raises to $0.30, BTN raises to $0.80, SB folds, Hero raises to $2.20, 2 folds
Results: $1.95 pot
Hero mucked 9 9 and won $1.95 ($1.15 net)
My line looks extremely nutted. Again the same situation, CO open BTN 3bets, which is usually the most common spots for light 3bets. The 3-bettor was from Germany, so I expect him to be competent. Not really too keen on stacking off with 99 here, but I highly doubt I'm going to be played back at here considering how strong my line looks.
But honestly, you don't need to 4b bluff too frequently at all.
I am assuming you meant 'check on the river'. You have no SDV on the turn.
You said you 'read him for a FD'. Given that read: What are you hoping to fold / get called by on the river? Why do you think villian will fold / call?
4-bet bluffing isn't something you should do often at all.
Out of the 5 most recent hands I've 4bet, only one has been a bluff (while a second has been a semi-bluff).
Preflop: Hero is CO with A 3
2 folds, Hero raises to $0.30, BTN raises to $0.80, 2 folds, Hero raises to $2.20, BTN folds
Results: $1.75 pot
Hero mucked A 3 and won $1.75 ($0.95 net)
He 3bet very quickly, made me believe it was a bluff. Had blockers to Ax as well, so it's unlikely he has a hand like AQ or something. If he did have AQ I might even be able to throw him off of it.
Then this hand which was turned into a semi-bluff.
Preflop: Hero is BB with 9 9
2 folds, CO raises to $0.30, BTN raises to $0.80, SB folds, Hero raises to $2.20, 2 folds
Results: $1.95 pot
Hero mucked 9 9 and won $1.95 ($1.15 net)
My line looks extremely nutted. Again the same situation, CO open BTN 3bets, which is usually the most common spots for light 3bets. The 3-bettor was from Germany, so I expect him to be competent. Not really too keen on stacking off with 99 here, but I highly doubt I'm going to be played back at here considering how strong my line looks.
But honestly, you don't need to 4b bluff too frequently at all.
H1: I don't think it's horrible but the 3b quickly timing tell i wouldn't go by.
H2: I'd say people light 3b alot more in the blinds as opposed to BTN. What are the stats of CO + BTN? I'm not a huge fan of H2 as it is, no blockers + i assuming your 4b folding?
H1: People have different timing tells. I took the risk with this person quickly 3-betting. I've found that multi-tabling nits will 3-bet quickly with strong hands since they take focus from their other tables to look at the one where they have AA or something.
H2: 4bet/folding, of course. I'd honestly expect BTN to fold some TT hands here, and possibly strong Ax hands. If he was from Russia or something I'd play it differently (no offense Russians, but you guys can't fold), but since he was from Germany, and 3-betting to a decent size, I figured he was at least a decent player for these stakes and fold fairly frequently.
No stats on either of the hands, with any of the players. I've started not using a hud again since I've found myself getting caught up in stats, and leveling myself because of them. "Oh, this player 3b's 12% of the time, so when I 4bet I can stack off with JJ here" or something. I've found myself playing better without a hud, so yeah.
I think around 10NL you should start to consider 4betting light a lot more.
Something I'm a little confused about is how we calculate a balanced 4b range with the assumption that we're 100bb deep and villain never calls a 4b (let's assume we're IP). Is the bet size for working out our bluff:value ratio what we actually bet or 100bb (what villain has to commit to continue)? I'm tending towards the latter which allows us to have a ton of bluffs relatively but I'm not sure our 4b/c range is wide enough in that case?
If I was to record a session, possibly with some commentary so my thoughts during a hand are clear, would anyone be interested in going over it for review?
@Olybrah, I'd take a look. Having done similar, if you're recording a session make it less than 30 mins and make sure the resolution is ok to see the HUD stats, and you're not playing too many tables.
Here's my Oct graph
Pretty pleased the move to 25nl Zoom seems to have stuck (for now at least). As you can see, did well at the start, then had a nasty downswing coupled with a little tilt, but recovering ok for now.
Goals for November:
[ ] Play more A game
[ ] Recognise when I'm not playing A game much quicker and act on it
[ ] Work on new concepts where needed, eg check/calling ranges
[ ] Continue at 25nl