Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Micros at pokerstars Micros at pokerstars

01-09-2010 , 11:08 PM
Iv heard that pokertars dont do rakeback so thats why i despostied on full tilt.I only despostied 50 dollars and iv ran that up with the help of bonus's,rakeback and an aveage win rate.

My question is though would it be worth despositing 50 onto pokerstars and start a bankroll there as they dont have rake on pots under 1 dollar.In the long run full tilt looks better but to grind 2nl and 5nl pokerstars would see more a profit? anyone have any advice .Would it be worth investing into pokerstars to have another roll
Micros at pokerstars Quote
01-09-2010 , 11:11 PM
You can withdraw your money when ever you want so you aren't risking anything.

As far as 27% RB vs no rake <$1, no rake sounds better to me but I haven't done the math.
Micros at pokerstars Quote
01-09-2010 , 11:13 PM
it sound like you will be out of 2nl in no time. most pots are above $1 at higher stakes, so stay there unless you goin to be a 2nl pro.
Micros at pokerstars Quote
01-09-2010 , 11:18 PM
its worth spreading money if you can afford to based on your role and expected win rate, this way you can table select more, in saying that at these levels ABC poker will win every day of the week.
Micros at pokerstars Quote
01-09-2010 , 11:21 PM
including NL 10 it is often suggested to play on Stars. at NL25/50 it would be more profitable to play FTP
if you can reach Supernova on Stars, then it becomes an option again
Micros at pokerstars Quote
01-09-2010 , 11:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xMars
including NL 10 it is often suggested to play on Stars. at NL25/50 it would be more profitable to play FTP
if you can reach Supernova on Stars, then it becomes an option again
Probably agree, I would say stars is softer aswell when you move up the limits.
Micros at pokerstars Quote

      
m