Quote:
If you want to just call because his range is so strong you also need to think you will be able to get the money in when you hit your flush.
Well I think his calling or stacking off range is fairly strong, not overly so with his betting range. It is not that a raise is not profitable, it is just less profitable than it would be in another dynamic, and whilst it is still profitable, peeling, even OOP, is more profitable because I expect him to not barrel, not call down too light, and be straightforward over all, making my hand easy to play by keeping pot small. Vs a tricky player I think stacking off would make it a lot easier, but I think peeling to re-eval would be fine vs a player whom I thought would play transparently.
So in short, I think if I raise I have to stack off, and it'd be fine, I can't raise/fold, but 35% is not that great, tbh. When I think I have more EV calling and re-evaling, I don't think I have to stack off, even with my FE, when I have only 35% equity when stacking off because I feel like I can win the hand a vast majority of times in later streets either by hitting or stabbing and bluffing off ace high or mid pairs.
As for range balancing, I didn't think it was that important as I have no history aside from me having loose hud stats and him being more on the tight side, and idk if I need to bother with it FR. I am slightly on the autobotting side in terms of making reads. Most of my reads are on weird plays and vs donks, not on tight regs (obviously I marked this hand down for future reference).
I would've liked a shove on the turn because I have more equity vs KK AA and sets now, which imo is enough a part of his stack of range for it to be significant, whereas on the flop I only have flush outs, and also because my hand looks quite strong and I have FE vs overpairs and top pair type hands.
That's just my take on it, of course.