I am sorry if this has been asked here before, but I cannot find it.

At betonline if there is a player all in he can cashout his hand on the spot for the equity (and gives up a fee). If he "loses" the hand then he gets that cash out amount and the winning player(s) still gets paid the full pot. Choosing this is not a good idea.....but...

If someone does choose this option and then the remaining player(s) wants to deal it twice isn't it stupid for the player that took the cash out to not run it twice? It is money that will leave the table. It seems like people just decline running it twice when taking the cash out to be d*cks. Unless I am missing something here.

It is stupid to do either. Giving up equity is dumb. Slowing games down because you can't handle variance is dumb.

But that doesn't answer my question. I agree that you should never cash out. But if you do you should definitely deal it twice otherwise money is leaving the table if the other person does win a hand you are not really involved in anymore, correct?

All running it more than once does reduces variance. If you can't handle the variance at your stakes, MOVE DOWN and stop pissing people off who want to get on with the game