Quote:
Originally Posted by jkugelman
From the OP's reads I'd heavily discount flush draws and TT/JJ. He'd shown no history of playing a draw fast, and he didn't 3-bet pre. He didn't 3-bet pre but he pots a rag flop?
I'm comfortable letting AA go to a nit like this. We're always telling tight people to loosen up cause otherwise people won't pay off their big hands, right? Let's not pay off this guy's big hand. Getting it in versus his range is marginal at best, a likely a really terrible idea.
Before I went on my pokerstove kick a few months ago, i'd be in complete aggreement with you.
But i've been making it a point to try to play more like pokerstove and i've been discovering that hands I normally would have folded because "obviously villain has a set" turn out to be hands I am now winning because villain's range is wider than I thought.
So, lets discount that villain would fast play a FD. Fine. What I can't get over though is how villain would play TT-JJ here. You can't tell me that preflop villain would 3bet the UTG raiser with TT-JJ. Sure, its possible, but what is equally possible (if not more likely) is that villain just calls with TT-JJ. And then, when villain hits this low-ball flop, what would/should villian do?
TT-JJ is too vulnerable to smooth call, especially with a draw out there, and especially when Hero's range includes AQ, AK.
So, the question I have for you guys is what do you think TT-JJ does in this spot IP over the preflop raiser on this flop?
I submit that TT-JJ is NOT going to smooth call. I just can't see that. To me, TT-JJ raises.
And so, if TT-JJ is in villain's range (which I believe it is) then you have enough equity for a shove here even if you include sets in villain's range. Its close, but the math is the math.
Is a fold terrible here? No. I don't think it is, and i'd go so far as to say that a fold (given OP's reads) is okay.
But I do think you have enough equity to shove here based on my above arguments.