Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkOut
That's what I figured, but can't figure out why so many people talk about "Baccarat strategy". I mean what is this nonsense in this thread. To me this is like betting on a coin flip...what more is there to it?
Baccarat isn't a simple succession of coin flips even if it could appear to be.
"Coin flips" happen on 91.4% of the total BP resolved hands, in the remaining 8.6% Banker as a huge mathematical edge (15.86%) over the Player.
This asymmetry is the cause of different statistical distributions of every single pattern registered. Of course it's a diluted effect thus it takes a lot of time and a lot of study to grasp the possible proper situations to bet.
I mean that the process involves a lot more than knowing, for example, that B singles are inferior in number to B streaks or vice versa or that P streaks are shorter than B streaks.
Even though BP hands aren't beatable by card counting, baccarat remains a finite and dependent card game, let's say a situational dependent game.
The best tool to prove this is to compare the distributions of a constant 50.68/49.32 proposition to real 312 or 416 decks.
Finally, via card counting some side bets baccarat could provide the patient player huge mathematical edges.