Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33
I think you honestly should reconsider what a store of value is. Or what money is. Or gold. Or anything else we humans have collectively agreed is worth something.
I'd recommend this fairly brief overview written by Tyler Winklevoss which makes a pretty compelling case (YMMV of course) for Bitcoin as a superior store of value to assets such as gold and oil.
https://winklevosscapital.com/the-ca...-500k-bitcoin/
Now of course, you can make the argument that, as holders of massive amounts of BTC, the Winklevoss twins have a strong financial incentive to convince everyone how awesome it is. However I prefer to judge based on the validity of the arguments, and not on whether the arguments happen to align with the author's self-interest.
I got a ounce of Gold nobody believes my ounce of Gold is worth anything, why can I still extract value from the Gold regardless if the perception of value is gone from man?
I got a bitcoin nobody believes it is worth anything, how will I extract value from it when all the perception of value is gone?
The answer is
Gold has properties that maintain it's value regardless of perception
Bitcoin has no properties that give it any value, the only value it has is purely based on perception
Where did the value go that bitcoin was storing?
Why did the value Gold was storing still there?.
Also really rubs me the wrong way when you guys try and claim bitcoin is like Gold or even better but you do so using Gold to tell me these ridiculous things. Why not use bitcoin to tell me that, but at the very least don't use the actual metal that you're claiming is like bitcoin but worse, it makes you look dumb.