Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
I understand that if I put my money in to this "uncorrelated" "safe haven" "store of value" "real money" "soar when the fed prints money" asset a few weeks ago to escape the carnage in the stock market, I'd be down about 24% - double the amount the stock market went down.
Along with not being reliable in about 50 other ways, it's not a reliable store of value, not a reliable uncorrelated asset, not a reliable safe haven, not a reliable fed hedge.
I agree with you, but it doesn't mean any of those are not true!
You are basically saying that because it's not doing a good job, it automatically means it must not be any of the things you mention.
It can be all those but just not doing a very good job. My explanation stands, it's too young and hasn't got enough people behind it, not enough $$$.
What about in 10 years time and bitcoin at $10 trillion? You think people will flock to btc or negative interest bonds??