Quote:
Originally Posted by cassolete
Almost forgot .... Please, add an option in software "always decline insurance offer" for those who prefer not to use it, because it will save time for everyone and will not distract . Thank you. !
Quote:
Originally Posted by cassolete
And also a box "always accept insurance offer" for those who prefer to use it.
We have some improvements to insurance coming in the future that will make it much easier to use. You feedback is noted, thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamreallycrap
I dont like the request for automatic time bank or longer time banks etc.
If you dont have enough time for 2-5% of decisions then you are playing too many tables imo.
Some of the suggestions in this thread are bad for the game imo.
The less like stars, party and GG, the better imo.
By far the most pressing issue is the stability of the client.
Yeah, we understand your feedback and we're certainly not inspired by GG or Stars when it comes to our roadmap. IMO the perfect system is one that adapts to the ability of a player to multi-table, and reduces their table max if they are too slow, and increases it if they continue to play quickly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpillingChips
So what you're saying is to make this "legal" you have house players, playing with house money, taking money from customers, and returning it to the house?
WOW...
No. If they win, then we add the money into promos so it goes back to the player pool. I wouldn't feel comfortable keeping the money.
I know this is slightly weird, but it's actually better for the player pool than ambassadors playing under normal conditions. I would personally love to play against opponents who can lose, but cannot win.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enn Sink
What's the decision time and timebank in plo5 tables? It's very short, why is it like that? Any plans to make it slower?
I'm not sure of the exact configuration - I'll find out. Obviously there's a balance here between making the games too fast or too slow, but I'll look into it.