Quote:
Originally Posted by niosocket
Yeah, I wish I had the data from previous weeks, but unfortunately it looks like it's impossible to get through web interface.
If somebody has it saved somewhere in whatever format, please share.
Alright first off the PLO bots have avoided the top 2 tiers of Beast prizes for the most part, there was only one exception to this of the classical 2016 pokerstars PLO bot over the past year, Ca11mebaby.
Second, did it occur to you in your infinite wisdom that players may not compete in the Beast every week or sometimes not go for the same prize levels? Last week's race for the top tiers was one of the craziest of all time. Perhaps the participants were exhausted and took a few days or the week off afterwards. MegaDan has stated ITT that he normally only competes for the top tier every other week. What is more suspicious in my opinion are the consistent accounts that place in the $250 prize tier every single week (and also tend to get around the same amount of points). The high stakes PLO bots play very infrequently compared to the low/midstakes bots because those games do not run as often and they do not play every table of the games that do not run for unknown reasons.
What is the reason that the Beast leaderboard and SNC leaderboard are not accessible via the skin websites as was available before your incredible software was launched? Old beast results can be viewed on 3rd party sites but not since the "upgrade".
Your post is actually not great because you are posting it under the assumption that your magical fuzzy chips actually accomplished something. They didn't. You are impugning the names of many legitimate players.
Of the classical first generation bot accounts I see ribafishKKa, darkdailo, familier, wolf_DDDDOG online right now at PLO25-PLO400. The second generation PLO bots exCALibur6 and zzz888zzz are playing many tables.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosmo
I am a fish, but honest question...
Why havn't human players adopted the bots unique strategy?
Would you elaborate on the bots strategy ?
Is there a format on ACR that the bots are not active in?
thanks
For one the strategy works good when you have multiple accounts at the same table, so you are able to get away with crazy aggression including multiway because you have access to more information than your opponent. In general the classical first generation PLO bots play the following unique strategy: They defend the big blind vs steal very aggressively, they squeeze more than they 3bet preflop. They bet vs the oop preflop aggressor incredibly aggressively when closing the action including multiway. They cbet more multiway than they do headsup on the flop. They check raise and 3bet the flop at an high frequency on the flop and turn. They probe the turn when the preflop aggressor checks back the flop very aggressively, they defend vs probes with their generally capped turn ranges very aggressively (although they also do a good amount of slowplaying in some situations while still cbetting at an unreal frequency). They check raise the river at a very low frequency.
There is one format that there is no bots active in, all of the O8 variants. The bots also did not play stud or 6+. They also did not play cap tables or no rathole until recently.
There is a second generation of bots that is playing a totally different preflop strategy. I am waiting on more data to come in from my personal play before posting the data on these accounts. It really sucks that statname has completely stopped supporting WPN and will never in the future because now you have to play with the bots to get any data. That is a real consequence of the new software, the bot infestation has actually worsened.
Last edited by HandOfGod666; 10-14-2019 at 08:19 PM.