Quote:
Originally Posted by 39suited
Pretty simple, the inquiring minds of 2+2 always want to know the why's behind and if ACR would state in the forums that the funds are segregated, would that actually satisfy you and the 2+2 members or do you want to know more?
As pointed out in the quoted content from the website, it does pretty much "say" that the funds are segregated. At least that is what common sense tells me when I read it.
Do you work for ACR or are you an ACR affiliate? You seem to be pretty defensive and talk in a manner like you have inside information on their financials.
I'll simplify it for you. When the DOJ seized Stars, Tilt, AP and UB's bank accounts, I had 3 years of living expenses locked online. Fortunately for me, it was on Stars and I had all of it returned to me within 2 weeks.
Those that had any money on Tilt, AP, and UB got none of it returned to them. It wasn't just luck; I specifically stayed away from FT, AP and UB because I didn't trust them with my money or thought the company was poorly run (FT).
Can you at least be a little understanding of why people are apprehensive about putting money online after that fiasco? The only site that was able to pay out was the site that had segregated funds. Segregation is the only factor that makes US players' money safe.
If the website is accurate, then great. There still is zero reason why it cannot be discussed here in an official capacity. It puts them at no greater risk with the DOJ. Advertizing here that they are still accepting US players does, however.
That is their choice. They could pull out of the US market and be safe from the DOJ, but they choose to stay in the US market. Being so, they need to address US players' concerns.