Quote:
Originally Posted by Last Laugh
As a relatively new US online player, I thought it might be helpful to share my recent experiences with a few of the rooms.
I play mostly cash, but also dabble in MTTs and SNGs.
I am in California, and am using a Mac.
Merge/Carbon: Is the first site I signed up for and deposited on, and I still think it's overall the best for me. The software is good, traffic and game selection is good, and it is compatible with Pokertracker/HEM (I feel a good tracking program is critical for developing as a player.
Decent amount of traffic for cash, MTTs and SnGs. The Carbon mobile app is pretty good as well, definitely the best available site for tablet or smartphone users.
Bovada: Lots of traffic and pretty soft games in most cases. The software sucks and anonymous tables are really a departure from both live and regular online games. You don't get the benefit of longer term observation, which is an important skill to develop. Not being able to use PokerTracker/HEM on Bovada is a major issue. They do have a mobile app now, but you can only play Zone poker on it.
I guess not that surprisingly, when I don't want to take my play as serious-- if I'm tired or taking a shot at a new game or whatever, I feel safer at the anonymous tables. I totally get why it attracts recreational players. I don't play seriously on the site, but it's where I go to play PLO or take a shot at something new because I know I won't be crushed immediately and/targeted as a fish. Definitely the most traffic for all the game types I've cared to look at.
Equity Network / Full Flush. I signed up for Five Dimes first, but was unable to deposit as they don't accept Visa, so I moved on to Full Flush. I'd say it's a decent enough room, although the traffic is lower, notably on sngs and tourneys. No Poker tracker support. Software is so so, not as bad as Bovada, but not beautiful either. One thing that really bugs me about Full Flush, is that the full ring tables are 10 max instead of 9 like the rest of the sites I've played on. They do seem to have more promotions than the other sites, though. Traffic is lower, not much in the way of sngs.
Seals with Clubs: The best thing about bitcoin poker is the true ease of deposits and withdrawals. The site has lowish traffic and crappy software. However, the rake is really low - which is especially helpful for new players at the micros. Case in point - been practicing heads up lately. Bovada has a 5NL heads up table, but the rake at that stake is ridiculous and can easily eat up even a good winrate. At SwC, the equivalent stakes heads up table is much more reasonable. I hear they have an android app, too, which sounds good although I haven't actually tried it.
WPN I'd totally like to try, but no Mac support. Sigh.
I started on Carbon, and I think it's still the best option for a US player serious about learning poker. The software is great, PokertTracker/HEM support, decent traffic, and good mobile app. Having said that, I am keeping a small roll on all these sites and sometimes will have all 4 lobbies open looking for the best of whatever I'm playing.
Hope that helps someone!
Just thought I'd update with my journey in online poker.
I find that I don't play well on bovada, for some reason I tend to be more reckless and gambley on anonymous tables, and not being able to recognize regs doesn't allow me to adjust long term.
Full flush I want to like, but something about the software bugs me. It's not quite as fast as Merge, which makes a difference. Also the traffic for MTTs is pretty slow. And as I mentioned before, tables are 10 max instead of 9, and that is one too many for me.
So I find my self splitting between Merge and Seals. Merge is def the best software and traffic, seals software sucks but the rake is low and the cash outs are easy. Easy enough to have a table or two from both sites up at the same time.