Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread [PPPoker] Discussion Thread

06-29-2019 , 05:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeHumble!
Please pm me a list of all the people who were caught cheating at 20 a point? I lost a ton in those games and rly felt like I was getting cheated afterwards



Please pm me list of the names of the exposed cheaters, I lost a lot playing 20 dollars a point Chinese and felt I was getting cheated.
Hard to collude in OFC/Chinese poker due to the timing changes that happened a while back, and you only seeing a few throwaway cards. It's more PLO that you need to watch out for.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
06-29-2019 , 08:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrBadBeat
Hard to collude in OFC/Chinese poker due to the timing changes that happened a while back, and you only seeing a few throwaway cards. It's more PLO that you need to watch out for.
I played 1 year ago before the changes with names he mentioned....
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
06-30-2019 , 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallagher99
Hey guys. I really wish I could use a hud while playing PPPoker. I've been playing 3 tables on PC so far.
Is there any way to use a tracker/hud?
I heard of pokermasterhud but I'm not sure if it is optimal.
Duck it out (and see the software forums). There are many and they are with a monthly cost like 30 but if you find something cheaper. But PPPoker has given up supporting emulators (for PC). I don't as so see that Windows tablet would be supported either?

Android HUDs probably don't exist. Possibly going to get one or two Androids at some point, e.g Samsung Android at a 250e range (3gb ram, 32 gb rom, 10,1", the maximum pixels were a bit smaller than usual, 8-core, 10h was the best I spotted for these prices, that's kind of weak as my old phone is similar but tablets are weak).

Might not use it here but at some places one can have a Windows tablet with a HUD, though would lack power with an emulator when it comes to the Asian mobile sites.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
06-30-2019 , 05:36 PM
I tried playing Pppoker on my Android phone.

I get this error message:

"Tips
This is a GPS Restriction table. You must turn on Location Service to join the table.

GPS Restriction"

Any idea how to get around this? I get this error message for any table that I attempt to sit in.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
06-30-2019 , 06:29 PM
Turn on Location Service?
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-01-2019 , 01:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Turn on Location Service?


Or make sure your location settings for pppoker are set to “while using” rather than never.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-01-2019 , 08:24 PM
Just want to ask because Im in a fishy club but I have suspicions of some regs colluding even in 6 max tables, NLHE.

Their obvious line is especially on limped pots. Happens when Colluder 1 is IP and Colluder 2 is in SB or BB

Ex.
Colluder 1 from BTN limps
Reg from SB limps
Colluder 2 iso from Bb
Colluder 1 from BTN 3bets
Colluder 2 calls

Now the reg here is being squeezed. Stats of said colluders are something along the lines of 32/24. Now I think we can agree that it is a very suspicious strategy for a villain with these stats to have. And this happens almost every orbit.

And to add, I have never seen a showdown when these two colluders go to the flop unless the squeezed player comes along.

Do you guys still think its ok to be up against 2 colluders and 3 huge fish or do we just leave the table? I have reported this to my agent but unfortunately no one seems to do anything about it. Prob the colluders are tied to the owners but w/e

Im still a winning player, regularly cashing out but im sure this definitely affects my WR.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-01-2019 , 09:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by personalpokercoach
Just want to ask because Im in a fishy club but I have suspicions of some regs colluding even in 6 max tables, NLHE.

Their obvious line is especially on limped pots. Happens when Colluder 1 is IP and Colluder 2 is in SB or BB

Ex.
Colluder 1 from BTN limps
Reg from SB limps
Colluder 2 iso from Bb
Colluder 1 from BTN 3bets
Colluder 2 calls

Now the reg here is being squeezed. Stats of said colluders are something along the lines of 32/24. Now I think we can agree that it is a very suspicious strategy for a villain with these stats to have. And this happens almost every orbit.

And to add, I have never seen a showdown when these two colluders go to the flop unless the squeezed player comes along.

Do you guys still think its ok to be up against 2 colluders and 3 huge fish or do we just leave the table? I have reported this to my agent but unfortunately no one seems to do anything about it. Prob the colluders are tied to the owners but w/e

Im still a winning player, regularly cashing out but im sure this definitely affects my WR.
They are squeezing him for....5bb? It's possible they are cheating and are bad at it, but why wouldn't the button raise and then the bb 3b/btn 4b/bb fold? That gets the mark for 2.5bb more. And if either player has a good hand they could just have the bb 3b and the btn flat and play the hand with 8 cards and both people having position. If these guys are "colluding" by bloating the pot HU in order to steal an extra .5bb from the sb, and in turn paying more than .5bb extra in rake, they are very bad at poker and colluding and you should have no issues crushing them.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-01-2019 , 11:01 PM
Hey, I just had an issue in a legit ppp club, but the software crashed.

I was playing OFC with joker variant in a 16 card FL hand with a royal ready to be set at 1 a point. I couldnt set the hand, and got booted from the table while it attempted to load. Hypohtesize around 200-250 in equity lost. Has anyone had an issue like this? Tried to reach out to support but they seem to be non responsive so far. WiFi was streaming netflix and continued entire time without issue. It was def the software client. Fun timing considering I'm a winning player that was getting my face kicked in today before I ran into that issue.

Anyone have any recommendations or if its a lost cause?

Thanks.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-02-2019 , 12:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sic Tight Dude Bro
It was def the software client.
While that's very possible, and maybe even quite likely, your "Netflix was working so it was def the software client" could be a leap too far. Some areas of the world can have Internet glitches while others don't.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-02-2019 , 06:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GhoulPatrol
They are squeezing him for....5bb? It's possible they are cheating and are bad at it, but why wouldn't the button raise and then the bb 3b/btn 4b/bb fold? That gets the mark for 2.5bb more. And if either player has a good hand they could just have the bb 3b and the btn flat and play the hand with 8 cards and both people having position. If these guys are "colluding" by bloating the pot HU in order to steal an extra .5bb from the sb, and in turn paying more than .5bb extra in rake, they are very bad at poker and colluding and you should have no issues crushing them.
Thats just one example. Most of the times it gets limped 4-5 way then one of them squeezes, then always both of them get to the flop along with fish that called.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-02-2019 , 08:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by personalpokercoach
Just want to ask because Im in a fishy club but I have suspicions of some regs colluding even in 6 max tables, NLHE.

Their obvious line is especially on limped pots. Happens when Colluder 1 is IP and Colluder 2 is in SB or BB

Ex.
Colluder 1 from BTN limps
Reg from SB limps
Colluder 2 iso from Bb
Colluder 1 from BTN 3bets
Colluder 2 calls

Now the reg here is being squeezed. Stats of said colluders are something along the lines of 32/24. Now I think we can agree that it is a very suspicious strategy for a villain with these stats to have. And this happens almost every orbit.

And to add, I have never seen a showdown when these two colluders go to the flop unless the squeezed player comes along.

Do you guys still think its ok to be up against 2 colluders and 3 huge fish or do we just leave the table? I have reported this to my agent but unfortunately no one seems to do anything about it. Prob the colluders are tied to the owners but w/e

Im still a winning player, regularly cashing out but im sure this definitely affects my WR.

At what club and stakes is this happening?
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-02-2019 , 01:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Turn on Location Service?


For Android: Settings -> Apps -> (locate PPPoker) -> Permissions -> (toggle Location ON)
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-03-2019 , 03:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sic Tight Dude Bro
Hey, I just had an issue in a legit ppp club, but the software crashed.

I was playing OFC with joker variant in a 16 card FL hand with a royal ready to be set at 1 a point. I couldnt set the hand, and got booted from the table while it attempted to load. Hypohtesize around 200-250 in equity lost. Has anyone had an issue like this? Tried to reach out to support but they seem to be non responsive so far. WiFi was streaming netflix and continued entire time without issue. It was def the software client. Fun timing considering I'm a winning player that was getting my face kicked in today before I ran into that issue.

Anyone have any recommendations or if its a lost cause?

Thanks.
Lost cause. Happens to poker clients a lot, some more than others. It happens to everyone will even out over time. Sure you've had people you are playing time out also.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-03-2019 , 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by personalpokercoach
Just want to ask because Im in a fishy club but I have suspicions of some regs colluding even in 6 max tables, NLHE.

Their obvious line is especially on limped pots. Happens when Colluder 1 is IP and Colluder 2 is in SB or BB

Ex.
Colluder 1 from BTN limps
Reg from SB limps
Colluder 2 iso from Bb
Colluder 1 from BTN 3bets
Colluder 2 calls

Now the reg here is being squeezed. Stats of said colluders are something along the lines of 32/24. Now I think we can agree that it is a very suspicious strategy for a villain with these stats to have. And this happens almost every orbit.

And to add, I have never seen a showdown when these two colluders go to the flop unless the squeezed player comes along.

Do you guys still think its ok to be up against 2 colluders and 3 huge fish or do we just leave the table? I have reported this to my agent but unfortunately no one seems to do anything about it. Prob the colluders are tied to the owners but w/e

Im still a winning player, regularly cashing out but im sure this definitely affects my WR.
Tin foil hat fully on with this post haha. Colluders being tied to the club owners is also a massive leap unless it's a tiny club with 1 table running or something in which case shouldn't be playing on it.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-03-2019 , 10:57 PM
Anyone else think pppoker rng is a bit weird?
I'm only running 2 tables but I see a lot of quads, straight flushes & also a bit too much of turns rivers that's pretty bad for overpairs/all in as fav.
Asking cause it has come up before.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-04-2019 , 06:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alucard5077
Anyone else think pppoker rng is a bit weird?
I'm only running 2 tables but I see a lot of quads, straight flushes & also a bit too much of turns rivers that's pretty bad for overpairs/all in as fav.
Asking cause it has come up before.
This is basically impossible to confirm without any stats or software,but if I

have to say after playing 1/2 million of hands I agree with you.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-04-2019 , 10:26 AM
I play 2 tables of ignition and 2 tables of ppp at the same time.
Have noticed that 3 of a kind on board seems to happen more often on PP then on IGN.

Ran some filters,
On PPP I found 294 out of 43,174 hands where there are tree of a kind by the river.

On IGN I found 3,217 out of 580,370 hands where there are three of a kind by the river.

PPPoker : 294 / 43,174 = 0.0068096539584009‬
Ignition: 3217 / 580,370 = 0.0055430156624222

Does seem to be slightly higher, although I am sure my sample is rather meaningless. Maybe if others run a filter we can get a bigger sample.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-04-2019 , 04:27 PM
Anyone else having this issue? Whenever I try to open more games it says only 1 games is allowed.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-04-2019 , 05:51 PM
yeah that just happened to me too.. But I got a pop up that said multitabling will be allowed in a week or something like that that. Closed out of it too fast and cant get it back up so not exactly sure what it said/ what they mean by that.

Also curious if people who use an emulator can still play more than one table.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-04-2019 , 08:37 PM
The pop-up says:

'Soft launch of multi-tabling (full launch within a week).'

I wonder what this means exactly, does soft launch mean only some multi-tabling is now already allowed?
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-05-2019 , 01:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bouglas
The pop-up says:

'Soft launch of multi-tabling (full launch within a week).'

I wonder what this means exactly, does soft launch mean only some multi-tabling is now already allowed?
It very likely means that you will be able to play multiple tables w 1 account
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-05-2019 , 06:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bouglas
The pop-up says:

'Soft launch of multi-tabling (full launch within a week).'

I wonder what this means exactly, does soft launch mean only some multi-tabling is now already allowed?
Should be allow in few days
up to 4 tables from one account
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-05-2019 , 09:51 AM
X-Club (74117) no longer exists - owner SHAUN stole player funds and went to have a destination wedding with it. Being owed over 2k. Been patient but enough is enough - its obvious now that you are a criminal and your players should act accordingly. Please pay up.
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote
07-05-2019 , 05:45 PM
Using bluestacks emulator I am getting the GPS location error even though I have location settings enabled. What I am doing wrong?
[PPPoker] Discussion Thread Quote

      
m