Quote:
Originally Posted by omnishakira
Sry for my english. The support in french takes like 5 days to reply so I'd rather write in english
_______
Hi,
I've played a 3 hours session of poker today and noticed I only had 207 party point for that which is way lower than before. My HEM told me that I've raked about 145$ this session. I've done some calculation and 207 party point for 145$ equals to 21,41% of rakeback if I'm planning to buy your 3000$BONUS which is supposed to be worth 30%.
I've a VPIP of 18,6 on a full ring cashgame which is considered as loose and still, i'm having a huge hit of rb income since you switched it to contributed. I'm used to have about ~85pp per hour and since i'm loose, I was expecting to get more now. The truth is I'm below 70pp/hour. I won't be playing poker for 20% rakeback when it is so easy to find a 40% deal out there.
I'm seriously planning on taking my 3000$rake/month volume somewhere else if you don't give me the same pp rate that I used to have. I will reach palladium VIP, take the 3k$ bonus w/ my point and quit if you let it to contributed.
I've played a LOT on party in my life. I don't wanna quit but 20%rb is unacceptable for the volume I put in.
Regards,
Francois
In the future you might want to take heed of what people who have gone through certain experiences, such as the change to weighted contributed, are telling you rather than assuming you know everything. The impact of weighted contributed rakeback is extremely counter-intuitive which makes it particularly insidious because it does seem ostensibly fair, but it couldn't be further from it. If you are a winning player, you will lose money under weighted contributed. The only question is how much and in most cases the answer will be a lot, even if you are a much looser than average player.