Quote:
Originally Posted by scammed77
I'm really starting to think of some of the responders are nit picking little pussies almost like women who nit pick every little thing... and you are incorrect the term one on one is used in poker.. I already showed a site that uses it as others do also..maybe as I said I should have said ONE ON ONE limit room instead of 1-1
There is a MINIMUM buy in in say the 3-6 one on one room... you can also buy in for 300$ or more which I used to do at first.. In my first few years I would buy in for $300 which I call max in the 3-6, and that is the amount that would show up as a default if you didn't buy in for the minimum... but after seeing the pattern I just would buy in for the min 30$ knowing if I went all in I would survive.. why don't you either address the main point of my post instead of being a little girly bitch lololo
If you play limit it will 'feel' like the 'all in' always wins.
A short stacking stategy cant win in limit so when you see the 'all-in' mentally you know your opponent made a mistake and it therefore hurts more if it doesn't go right
also you get a 'high' off of a short staker in limit when you see a zero. It's like 'serves them right.' Or especially if you truly bust their acct. that's one of the biggest 'highs' ever and ill never understand why people turn off their chat...
So it hurts more when they win 'all in' in limit than if they were fully loaded and just on to the next hand in otherwords..
i know im not explaining this right but the deal is definitely straight.