Quote:
Originally Posted by Uh*Oh
The casino may insist that you use a 'player card' for their own reasons, but they have nothing to do with FinCEN requirements. Only legal ID will suffice if you go above the threshold. I can see why they want the public to believe it's linked though.
I don't disagree, you can instead provide ID - but this process helps speed up the cage reporting requirements.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bylaw
TT is an arrogant *******. So much so, the flagship for arrogance the, inner circle of 2+2 had to bounce TT out.
Other than that he is a great guy.
This post will probably get me banned.
Did I ban u at one time back when I worked for 2+2 or win a big pot off you or something? I can assure you I wasn't bounced. You can accuse me of being pompous, and that might be correct. But I don't think anyone would call me arrogant - I'm someone who works in poker biz behind the scenes, quietly. I don't look for a spotlight. I can accomplish more this way.
With that said, glad u think I'm still a great guy ;/). And I can assure you that nobody would ban you for that post unless it was discovered that you were banned before in the past for a real issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelflush
In other words, you've never met TT.
Have we met? That's very nice of you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmm422
The majority of casinos in the world require membership before entering. It's just an American thing to let people come in willy nilly. I know some states check ID before you can enter, but they don't log you, it's just because of alcohol. They should be logging everyone.
There have been a number of thefts in European casinos that were resolved, and they wouldn't have been without this. That cuts down on the crime quite a bit. Counterfeit chips, stolen plaques, stolen handbags...all the criminals doing it get caught.
Agree. Traveling through Europe opened my eyes, in many markets you need a passport or ID card that is checked before you even walk in the building.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmm422
And you are correct 100%. This is about protecting themselves from liability, and not the players. It's kind of sickening. It still won't stop people from structuring things who don't want to be found at all.
Agree, but I don't think it's sickening. It's a minor issue, much ado about nothing IMHO. And your right, this is only a deterrent - it will not stop structuring. But it's a first step, and if it makes FinCEN happy then that's a good thing.