Quote:
Originally Posted by Gioco
I think that another portion covering other gambling winnings under certain circumstances is the most likely provision to cover this situation; if not, then it will probably be reported on a 1099-MISC. That is the form that usually is used for the taxable portion of p.i. settlements and can be used for any payment that the payor feels a need to report.
There is really no way on its face to know if a balance returned represents a remainder of a deposit (and hence has no tax implications) or a deposit plus winnings (which has tax implications)*.
The only way to know the difference would be to scrutinize the individual's entire playing history, a herculean task I seriously doubt the DOJ will even consider undertaking.
The IRS may consider it worth undertaking, but hardly for every player. One would expect the IRS, to the extent it decides to examine the figures available, to only undertake such a time consuming task for exceptionally large balances.
And since the government will have all the information to begin with, it will somewhat amusing if they issue forms to inform themselves of what they already know.
Skallagrim
* please note this is an over-simplification of the way taxes are assessed on playing poker. Accordingly, do not use this statement as part of figuring your taxes. This distinction is made only to illustrate that the amount of the balance ALONE does not indicate one way or another whether taxes are owed or not.