Yes, doing a little research...not sure if I really believe everything Brandon is saying. I do believe she made off with his shiit but I think these posts are bluff attempts to get her to call him. And...I think he would take her back.

She probably has some kind of dirt on him the cops would be interested to hear about.

Most definitely. And in the off chance there isn't any she'll make some up.

Assuming it's clear that it was his property that he originally bought, what's to stop her from saying that he gave her permission to sell it? The guy gave her a LOT of money, by his own admission. How can he prove that she's lying about this particular incident?

This should definitely be an episode of "Judge Judy".

Probably the most logical thing I read on here and if brandon doesn't take this course of action it calls his whole story into question. If you work as a PitBoss at a casino, there is no reason in the world you can't accomplish this.

Now after reading both threads all the way through I am agree with the opinion that what OP says may be mostly true - this is more likely a pathetic attempt to smoke her out and get her back. If he truly wanted her arrested and his story was true he would use Casino connections and/or the authorities to accomplish it. Perhaps Brandi doesn't want you back bro? I think you might be pssy whipped beyond reason but you need to get this girl outta your head.

I blame the other 6 lame brandi threads for this one being clearly under-represented. this thread should be better by now...

Unless brandi posts the threads are officially dead.

people can say anything they want at any time, but what does that have to do with anything?

rarely say this, but good thinking.

Yeah, Im sure if it was YOUR situation you would not be following your own advice and suggestion, why, because its simply ******ed bro.

Not so sure. Lot's of old geezers names being thrown around.

Does anyone know?

He can't prove it, but in court OP will likely be believed. How is she going to convince a judge that he suddenly wanted to live in a house without appliances or any of his stuff, and allowed her to sell it without keeping any of the proceeds for himself? He'll be able to establish that it was his stuff, she sold it while he was gone and that he recieved none of the proceeds (because she won't be able to produce any documentation of money transfers from her to him).

Brandi needs some decent counter evidence if she's going to prevail in court.

That's a good point. Thanks. I guess i was just thinking that if she had a creative lawyer, it would be hard to convict her. That's why i'm not a legal expert.

The problem is he is unlikely to have established she stole/robbed this amount of stuff from them to any degree that will have them do anything about it.

Since she lived with him, they will likely consider it a domestic matter, and a civil matter.

He could get lucky, but it is unlikely.

Hate to break it to you.. but if you go down to the police station and claim your live-in girlfriend stole some stuff from your house, they are not racing to issue a warrant.

pimpr,

How do you respond to the fact that David Sklansky implies you are not telling the whole truth and that he "believes there is more to this story than meets the eye." ?

Yeah she will need.. He gave it to me as a present.. as a defense.

People really need to realize that the police don't like to get into the middle of this kind of stuff because it is a massive waste of their time.

If it was some kind of more involved or elaborate con or scam they might be interested.. but just saying she took My Egg off the mantle after I drove my dad's porsche in the lake, is not going to get it done.

I'm not saying he is lying. But he may be leaving stuff out. Or putting a different spin on things than an objective observor would. Plus I said there MAY be more to the story. I'm sure most peple would agree.

Read my other post, that defense doesn't make sense. Brandon gave her all his appliances so he could live in a house without a washer/dryer/toaster, etc? And told her to sneak everything out while he was away? And she didn't give him any of the money, and has nothing in writing to confirm her story?

Her word isn't going to be enough here, esp. if any character witnesses are allowed. Easy win in civil court, and she might have trouble creating reasonable doubt in criminal court.

He is not going to get her in civil court.

She will not show up. He will get a judgment. She is judgment proof. So it will be a big waste of time.

Regardless of how altruistic you now choose to portray your original intentions, once you interjected sex and money into the relationship you forfeited all claim to helping and became just another part of the problem. Accept your responsibility, stop whining, move on, lesson learned. The fabrication that your posts are intended to protect others is tawdry and base. You knew what she was about. You fed her addiction and you used each other. Now you want a refund.

From now on I an not stealing the blinds, I am Brandi'ng the blinds.

So basically once you have had sex with someone you can proceed to steal anything they own without consequence?