Quote:
Originally Posted by bumpnrun
This.
What will also be interesting is if this turns out to actually be GOOD for poker in the long run. Obviously a lot of regs/people are hurting right now as their income is under fire, but you pros have been grinding the games down and making them unattractive to recreational players for a long time now. Your occupation was never suppose to be stable so you shouldn't be all that surprised, and you should have a plan. You do have a plan.... right?
Good luck to you regs.....and to poker
this has been said so often now by many people its ridic.
THE WHOLE POINT OF POKER IS THAT IT IS A SKILL GAME, ie some people will
win and some will lose. Winning players doesnt kill the game winning player is part of the game as are losing players. The whole point of poker is to try and win???
IF the rake reaches a point where no one can win and best you can do is lose at 2% because of rake, and the same site offers a video poker that has a house edge of 1% does it still mean that the video poker game is a casino game and the peer to peer poker game is still a game of skill?
even though you will have a higher ev playing a casino game lol.
also a lot of people seem to think any news where regs are losing money its good for recreational players. If chnages mean regs win less money then the changes mean recreational players will lose money even more!!