Quote:
Originally Posted by BrickPlz
Tell me your not serious ?
1. They never played competitively against each other . fact.
2. They made playing arrangements . this is collusion.
3. They are splitting profits (only a dummy would think otherwise) this is
against the integrity of the game as said by pokerstars.
1. If they were playing "real poker" for a half hour and then did this for the last 5 hands or so would you say the same thing? The right play was to see as many hands as fast as possible
2. Playing arrangements applies to other players, not HU
3. What if 2 people agreed ahead of time to split the promo prize if either won anything and never played vs each other then won playing "real poker?" Edit: if they never played each other then it's no issue. But how about if they played 24 FR tables and a few of them were both at same table.
These guys did the most they could to have the best chance of hitting the 70 billionth hand. I don't have a problem with it. I wish I could have played (US
) and hit the milestone. PokerStars does not have a problem with it. At least PokerStars did not find anything sufficient to constitute abuse of the promotion worthy of penalty at it's sole discretion.
I don't see why so many people have their panties in a wad over this. No rules were broken. PokerStars has a pretty good track record of finding violaitons of their ToS and punishing the guilty parties.
I do agree it's against the spirit of the promotion, but that's not breaking a rule and PokerStars duty is to enforce the rules, not make life fair.