In a situation like this I always see these glaring psychological tells way more than the appearance itself. For instance all the babes bopping around the poker room scantily clad or at the table with low cut tops just looks idiotic and off-putting to me. Same thing here. Not that she is an idiot, she isn't at all, but that part of the plan fails utterly from a psychological perspective.

lol... was gonna make a comment, but, ahhh, nevermind.... lol

She's definitely one of the better players in that line up, plus she has a lot more live experience now.

It was definitely an error IMO by Dara O'Kearney (he makes very few and has a great backing record) backing or part backing her into big live cash games and big buy in MTTs when she had
almost zero live experience. Putting the slightly socially awkwardness aside, it was still a big ask for any new to live player to be able to master live game skills right off the bat, playing
biggish money. It is just not the way that it is done.

His rationale was that she is and was such a fast learner at learning GTO cash game strat for online and GTO MTT strat online, that it was worth a risk helping her into those bigger live cash games and MTTs.

I don't know if it was a makeup deal so that he can recoup the previous losses, or if it was just single sessions or single groups of comps. If it was make up based I think she will make him his money back and more on top, and the same if he is net down, but is continuing to back her. She is definitely +EV in most cash game line ups, and is either +EV now or will get to being +EV soon in live MTTs.

It was just a little bit too early for her in the live game, the first time around. She now has better live skills and is more socially comfortable in the environment.

Gl to Poker Bunny in this upcoming Max Pain Monday.

I know, right? It's like when someone hits rock bottom but keeps digging...it speaks for itself, little commentary needed lol.

And so nothing against Bunny really, but I'm just asking: there are people who see such things and find it attractive or arousing?

sashimi had challenged her the previous week that they both wear a bikini the following week. this was obviously before sashimi had to cancel.

you guys got some weird hate **** going on.

Don't comment about her looks! (LOL @ chat mods on YouTube).

Something is very broken here.

Although sashimi seems to say stuff like that all the time to get attention but close to zero chance she would do it. Poker bunny will just get her clothes off as soon as its mentioned

Poker bunny is a nice person and looks amazing. I don't understand what you guys are talking about like I don't get it.

this is so far off base.

if i get my money in with top set three times, versus a FD, and lose all 3 times, am i a "losing player"? or is my expected value positive in those situations even though the actual result is negative? very small minded thinking here and i believe you can do better.

you do realize she wants people to comment on her looks?

Yes, that's why I am making fun of the YouTube mods trying to mitigate those chats.

Man vertucci why you gotta be unprofessional.

You run a stream man, at least put your comment in quotes so we think it’s coming from poker bunny herself. Surely you could have clipped and made a better comment than this. Our girl poker bunny just out here tryin’ to live.

Yes you are a losing player assuming that those are the only hands of poker you have ever played. A losing player is one that is net down. A winning player is one that is net up. Neither refers to your skill, they both refer to your results.

Wow, that's a matter of different definitions. I go with the more common defi ition of winning player - somebody who plays with a positive ROI and will win in the long run. Winning players have had points in their life where they've lost more then they've won. Say a mid stakes grinder binks a tourney, then goes broke playing high stakes. Maybe try were losers in high stakes, or maybe they were still small winners but we're severely under rolled for the big games they moved up too. Either way, they're still 'winning players' in the mid stakes games they grinded for years, which means are winners in over 90% of poker games. Instead of 'they, maybe I should just say 'joe cada...' but this hypothetical can happen to anyone.

Which is why I prefer my definition. I examine facts; are you winning or losing. Your definition allows people to lie to themselves as in my experience most people significantly over rate their theoretical ev by not properly examining the ev when the money went in. Have numerous times seen people complain that they got two outed on the river thus feeling they were sucked out on while ignoring that when the money went in they were a 4-1 underdog. YMMV

Just post the video instead of a screenshot

I see they replaced one nit (PB) with another (Matusow) for tonight's Max Pain Monday.

Loooool doesn’t matusow still think Postle is innocent?

Perfect idiot to get on their show. I wonder if he’s still playing with Hellmuth’s money.

I clicked on the vid somewhere in the middle just to see what they could possibly be talking about for an hour. That was painful. I gave up at approximately the 37th time she said "like" within a minute of viewing.

lol

When you don’t want your poker sugar daddy to know you called it off with a three

LoL