PartyPoker - The 48h Cash Game with live stream / April 11-13 ***rail thread*** - Page 53 - Poker News

Two Plus Two Forums Poker News & Discussion News, Views, and Gossip

PartyPoker - The 48h Cash Game with live stream / April 11-13 ***rail thread***

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 53 of 91

First

3 33 43 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 63 73

Last

Page 53 of 91

First

3 33 43 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 63 73

Last

04-12-2012 , 08:49 PM

#1301

SpeedLimiter

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 2,116

Torelli is such a tool

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:50 PM

#1302

Bearstat

stranger

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 4

someone needs to tell Jesse what angling is.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:51 PM

#1303

SKEEZ

adept

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 703

torrelli disgusts me

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:52 PM

#1304

Mezzomi

stranger

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 5

what was the hand they are all talking about?

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:54 PM

#1305

MrBump

WINNING

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 6,018

I'm guessing the prod team is trying to get it all sorted during the break so the players stfu about it

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:54 PM

#1306

AlanPartridge27

journeyman

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 228

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archi

I really dont get the Seiver KK fold. Everyone is talking about Laak folding the winner, but what was Seiver's thought process when he makes it 22k? he is a world class player, so he obviously knows he should not be doing that.. essentially bluffing with kings there if he folds. Just a brain-freeze? Just like Laak B)

i think scott was trying to get max value from the hand range alec had Jx, when alec shoves his range is mostly set's, its a super tough spott then. he expected alec to flat call and check call down, u just dont expect alce to re raise a J there for an extra moneys 70Keuro 100usd

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:54 PM

#1307

Anden

enthusiast

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 64

lol #1, Laak folding the winner in a €60k pot and not giving a ****.

lol #2, Torelli.

Right, also Siever folding KK in that pot = major lol. Especially after all the praise they gave him in the booth, "the sharpest mind in poker atm LOL!".

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:56 PM

#1308

Archi

adept

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 872

Quote:

Originally Posted by rebounder

anyone?

I tihnk Torelli limped? with AJ, and Seiver made it $4k. Torelli called. (I'm not sure if he limped though, since it was $800. I dont know how can $800 be a limp. Maybe there was a huge straddle or something. But I kinda missed it, and they said he limped. I dont trust the guys in the booth too much though. It might have been raise $800, 3-bet $4k. Anyways)

Flop is J24r, Torelli check, Seiver bet like $3,5k. Torellis raise to $10,5k, seiver to $22,5k, Torelli all-in, Seiver tanks and folds like ~25k behind. (Dont know exactly what he had behind. around $20k-$30k)

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:57 PM

#1309

TheJubilantMale

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,546

Quote:

Originally Posted by rebounder

anyone?

bet raise reraise shove fold.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:57 PM

#1310

MrBump

WINNING

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 6,018

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mezzomi

what was the hand they are all talking about?

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=1157

Who's that doing the commentary with Jesse ?

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:58 PM

#1311

TWSteel21

centurion

Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 107

They should run the 48 hour cash game alongside every WPT event great TV

Quote

04-12-2012 , 08:59 PM

#1312

David123

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 8,818

tony shouldnt tell him he should pay.

he isn't obliged to pay anything. paying anything at all would be a very nice gesture, but that's another thing.

edit: tony is probably just joking/ribbing tho

edit2: talking about moseley, not the side bet just to clarify.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:00 PM

#1313

Archi

adept

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 872

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlanPartridge27

So it was for information then? That's bad, as I'm sure you know it. In this kind of a game you cant put it past someone that they overplay AJ, maybe sneaky ***** with QQ or whatever.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:00 PM

#1314

carls

centurion

Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 155

Quote:

Originally Posted by David123

tony shouldnt tell him he should pay.

he isn't obliged to pay anything. paying anything at all would be a very nice gesture, but that's another thing.

Of course he's obliged to pay!

He has payed now so whatever but of course he has to.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:01 PM

#1315

maxz

journeyman

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 228

No need to give any money back, the possibility of mucking the winning hand is part of the game, it's a small risk you choose to take every time you don't show. It's just as much a gamble as any other part of the game is.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:01 PM

#1316

Archi

adept

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 872

Quote:

Originally Posted by David123

tony shouldnt tell him he should pay.

he isn't obliged to pay anything. paying anything at all would be a very nice gesture, but that's another thing.

edit: tony is probably just joking/ribbing tho

Yeah, that is not cool from Tony. Putting Moseley on a bad spot there. I dont think Laak needs the money that much. Probably humiliated by the mistake and it wont change even if he gets the money back.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:02 PM

#1317

PokahBlows

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 3,999

Phil Laak is an idiot I have never mucked the winning hand in my life in live poker.

Also,I'm glad online you can't muck a winner lmao.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:02 PM

#1318

seizureman18

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 241

He's talking about Moseley vs Laak i think

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:04 PM

#1319

AlanPartridge27

journeyman

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 228

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archi

So it was for information then? That's bad, as I'm sure you know it. In this kind of a game you cant put it past someone that they overplay AJ, maybe sneaky ***** with QQ or whatever.

first it was for value then he felt he was beat, and i think scott had like 65K+ to call off , not 20,30k, obv he can fold wit 20 k left behind

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:05 PM

#1320

KansasCT

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 10,074

Quote:

Originally Posted by PokahBlows

Phil Laak is an idiot I have never mucked the winning hand in my life in live poker.

Also,I'm glad online you can't muck a winner lmao.

and yet he's owning the ****ing table..

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:05 PM

#1321

PSUStudent

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 2,643

gross turn card but good fold by laak

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:05 PM

#1322

riconderoga

journeyman

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 319

Did Torelli end up paying Tony G or not?

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:05 PM

#1323

JSchnett

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,452

Wow I feel bad for Laak, bad mistake but very possible when you have been playing for that long. He clearly does not deserve any money back tho.

Sievers play seems pretty suspect but I didn't watch it.

Edit: good fold there by Phil.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:07 PM

#1324

PokahBlows

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 3,999

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archi

So it was for information then? That's bad, as I'm sure you know it. In this kind of a game you cant put it past someone that they overplay AJ, maybe sneaky ***** with QQ or whatever.

Yes betting for information is bad. But everyone does it on a J x x flop with AJ/KJ. If you say Seiver was bad for playing KK like that, what do you say about torreli's hand?

I think we should call it a merge raise otf, what do you guys think?

Quote

04-12-2012 , 09:08 PM

#1325

OMG_LadyGaga

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 2,302

Pretty awesome fold by Laak there. It's pretty sick that he's not tilted out of him mind from the A6 hand and is still making correct decisions. He deserves a ton of respect after this performance.

Quote

Page 53 of 91

First

3 33 43 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 63 73

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 53 of 91

First

3 33 43 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 63 73

Last