I don't know wtf you are babbling about.

Wtf are you talking about? The scumbag is suing ESPN, Poker News, other poker business entities and some of the biggest names in Poker for damages to his reputation. He is not suing anyone he played with except Brill. He is not defending himself nor did he in the other litigation.

So you continue to come in here and tell us what you “think” about statistical evidence that you have not analyzed yourself, have not reviewed anyone else’s analysis and believe because no one shared their analysis with you by now, it must be favorable to the scumbag cheater. Sorry that we don’t give your uneducated opinion the credit you think it deserves.

Let’s wait out the month and watch Postle get hit with a six figure bill for not showing up to the anti slap hearing. Then you can come back and tell us all about his alleged manhood.

Which part do you need help with specifically

Speaking of uneducated, you don't read very well. Go back to the original post. Save the hostility for your dog. Life too short to go off on a rant not knowing what you are talking about. You missed the points or didn't bother reading.

Quick recap- poster said Galfond and others said they would do statistical analyst of hands but never did. I'm saying they prob did but didn't like the results so never shared. That is all. Now go be angry somewhere else.

im just saying if we were playing werewolf and villagers.....dude would be voted hard. And then it would be him and everyone would be like...ok....next round?

btw do people still play that. it was among us before among us. i was talking strat with my nephew who is like 7? and i realized i was thinking strat from that game and it tripped me up hard.

blaze it.

Named one hand that what? Showed completely obvious cheating that no person with a brain who couldn’t see the cards would ever attempt? How about the times (two times) where he shoved someone off a chop with ak in a huge overbet when huge overbets leave money on the table or snapped off by a set? Or how the only times he got caught bluffing it was because the person made an incredible call that was only based off knowing he was running insane bluffs? Ie people knew he was fishy and called him down far lighter than any reasonable person would without knowing that he always seemed to know exactly when to bluff? Never bluffing off into the nuts? Winning way more than his spewy -100000 EV play style should net him?

See, its that last part there. In fact the only known data set is heavily biased by not counting add on and rebuys and does not demonstrate a huge winrate when stakes and the loose nature of the game are accounted for. It's likely he cheated, but the nature of the conversation is so religious that the absurdities of the claims creates a backlash.

That’s not an argument. That’s called poisoning the well. You tell me how all that stuff is possible and then maybe I’ll consider your “oh it just sounds too religious for me” argument.

So your gorilla logic is that this huge tedious project to be done in defense of Brill because of the defamation lawsuit was completed and unfavorable so it was never shared rather than it was not completed bc the lawsuit immediately failed or the results are being held for the defense of the litigation, right?

I would bet you believe Giuliani and Powell that the dominion machines were rigged by Chavez too.

This thread should be titled "Mike Postle cheating facts."

I'm really enjoying the introduction of the executivearsehole character. Every good comedy needs an idiot clown.

Why are all you guys so rude, How horrible are your lives? You people pouch on any chance to ridicule, sad.

I don't know what phil galfond saying he'll run the numbers has to do with any law suit. He isn't suing MP, right? Anyone for any reason can do their own research regardless of lawsuit.

I don't know why you are all wasting your time trying to argue. I said he prob did finish it but didn't like the results. That is my opinion, we are still allowed to have them. Stop bring up lawsuits and all this other nonsense, has nothing to do with what I said.

Clowns are trained in the art of physical humor and are entertainers of young and old alike and do not deserve the insult of sharing their classification with ilk like executiveauto.

Pay your lawyers, Mike. You're going to need them.

are you willing to bet on how often postle gets it all in preflop w54o on stream, yes or no?

No, the data contradicts your argument. Its possible even likely that he cheated but the data contradicts your argument.

Since you are apparently new at the intertubes, welcome. You will find that across the entire webz, residents' attitude meters are continuously set to "attack first." It's a side effect of anonymity. 2+2 is not immune to this effect, nor should you expect it to be.

why would you pay your lawyers when you're going to lose?

Ever notice all you guys use is the same half dozen or so hands when talking of postle cheating? He was cheating how long? And you all recycle the same few hands???? Then get all bent out of shape when others question your view point.

Fact is you and all the others can't prove ****. If you could it would be published.

Why is it poker players first reaction is to say how much you wanna bet? That and lets play heads up, and its always for higher stakes than the game they are at haha. As if being right and betting on it have anything to do with one another. I will not be betting anything, and I don't know what you are trying to prove, well I do know, but what you think you're going to try and prove doesn't prove anything and you will never understand that.

Betting on something means that you actually believe it. Not betting on it means you're just trolling probably.

The point where he started all the way up to the end was statistically proven (and obvious) by several people. Look through previous posts to see it. There are also a few youtube videos on it. Feel free to argue against the evidence presented in those.

lol, you on drugs? It's been published in an international magazine, a world wide sports program, and countless blogs and videos. You are also talking about something only a small segment of society is interested in, so this was never going to erupt into national news scandal making front page news (luckily for Mike). So from the beginning this was never going to get widespread attention and that has no bearing on whether he is innocent or not. I am actually surprised it got to level it did actually.

man your arguments suck, I hope you are not his new lawyer lol

This is the "Mike Postle cheating allegations" thread, not the "executiveauto containment" thread.

I think by now we all have a pretty good understanding what his position is and how you guys feel about that. I doubt it helps other readers to see the same back people going back and forth. Maybe you can get a group PM thing going and leave each other alone in here? Thank you.

2020-00286265-CU-DF
Michael Postle vs. Veronica Brill
Nature of Proceeding:
Filed By:
Motion to Strike (SLAPP)
Randazza, Marc J.
This matter is continued to 3/16/2021 at 01:30PM in this department

2020-00286265-CU-DF
Michael Postle vs. Veronica Brill
Nature of Proceeding:
Filed By:
Motion to Strike (SLAPP)
Bensamochan, Eric
This matter is continued to 3/18/2021 at 01:30PM in this department.


Tentative rulings on Wittles and Brill's Anti-Slapp motion.

My pure speculation based on being a northern california attorney, is the matter was continued because its a rare, not run of the mill issue and judge needed more time. Anti slapp ends the entire lawsuit (prior to discovery) and implicates all kinds of speech issues and rare attorney fees provisions. Court probably taking very seriously due to likelihood of appeal when you end a case prior to discovery.

Can someone give a brief update what happened so far in the Postle case? There's no way I'm gonna spit through 508 pages of people arguing against each other who's got the bigger attorney dick to find out, even though I'm really interested.
I know the case got dropped a couple of months ago due to some obscure law to protect gambling facilities. Any updates since then?

Pleaded guilty before the trial to avoid the death penalty. Life in prison without the possibility of parole.