Quote:
Originally Posted by AngusThermopyle
With smoking gun, what do they get?
Civil case is still a no-go.
Better chance at a criminal charge, but you would have to convince the DA to prosecute.
A smoking un is if he was wearing a bone conductor device, they could have got him using that red handed and taken it from him during a stream and shown it was transmitting live hole card information to him.
They could also have placed cameras in the room where the production staff were working to see how they were communicating with Postle, and how they were monitoring the action on the table.
They could have monitored Kuraitis and Postle, to build up a picture of their collaborative relationship outside the casino.
They could have looked at Kuraitis accounts to see if money was transferred to him from Postle, as Postle was winning, so would have had to pass Kuraitis his share.
They could have spent more time looking at the film if the game they were so suspicious about, to see what looked odd about them. As soon as the public saw the constant looking down was commented on, why didnt those with the suspicions take the time to look at what they were concerned about, before going public with vague allegations that they thought he was cheating but they didn't know how.
They could have placed cameras to record the seat Postle always sat at, so they could show what he was looking at on his phone under the table.
The list of missed opportunities to get the evidence together goes on and on. So circumstantially it is clear he did it, but at present as it stands, no definitive evidence has been presented publicly.