Any chance someone has hand histories of Postle on UB from back in the day?

Dug this up, but not sure if it would be admissible in court.

Hand: 14,382,144 03/14/2009 03:46 PT
Ultimate Bet, Hold'em No Limit - $25/$50 - 3 players
Rail Hand History Converter

JerseyBoys96 (BU): $4515.74 (90 bb)
pokerpreacher (SB): $5432.26 (109 bb)
$ApostleLypse72: (BB) $6496.48 (130 bb)

Pre Flop: ($75)
1 fold, pokerpreacher (SB) raises to $150, $ApostleLypse72 (BB) calls $100

Flop: ($300) 2 6 8 (2 players)
pokerpreacher (SB) bets $80.46, $ApostleLypse72 (BB) raises to $296.15, pokerpreacher (SB) calls $215.69

Turn: ($892.30) A (2 players)
pokerpreacher (SB) checks, $ApostleLypse72 (BB) checks

River: ($892.30) K (2 players)
pokerpreacher (SB) bets $436.25, $ApostleLypse72 (BB) raises to $6050.33 (all-in), pokerpreacher folds

pokerpreacher (SB) mucks 5 7 face up (Ace, King, 8 High Card, 5, 7 kicker)

Dealer turns pokerpreacher (SB) cards face down.

$ApostleLypse72 (BB) shows 3 4 (Ace, King, 8 High Card, 3, 4 kicker)

$ApostleLypse72 (BB) wins $1328.55

$ApostleLypse72 (BB) laughs

It is kind of interesting that in the interview with Matasow, Postle claimed to have been one of the biggest winners on UB. He seemed to be implying he got cheated, but maybe he was one of the cheaters?

My previous post #10702 is not a real hand history.....

"Dealer turns pokerpreacher (SB) cards face down", is the clue.

(I also have no idea what Mike Postle's UB sn was)

No suits, no rake, and final hands omit the board 6, which would play.

https://www.tmz.com/2020/04/06/marle...ia-cell-phone/

From today

"Great" lawsuit approach: Postle won too much money, Postle looking down, cashed 94% of sessions, suing for "lost money and damages"

LOL every sane judge/jury will dismiss this. Such a poor attempt.

Why isn´t she participating with the big lawsuit from the other players? Why doing it on her own? Seeking for attention?

Well it is strong circumstantial evidence but I agree that it may not be convincing enough for a jury and much of it can be ripped apart by a skilful defence.

Mike Postle knowing in the interview about only 2 of his 4 PLO cards showing on the graphics I am guessing he can explain away by him saying that someone told him about it before the interview happened, e.g. someone who was legitimately watching the stream on a 30 minute delay, or that he saw it happen himself on a 30 minute delay, so how is this good evidence against him, unless the interview took place less than 30 minutes after the hand, did it?

I know he was gesticulating during the hand itself, but again this is only circumstantial evidence. "Mr. Postle, why were you making such hand gestures during that hand of what I believe is called Pot Limit Omaha poker". "Well, Sir, I am a No Limit Hold'em specialist, one of the best No Limit Hold'em players in California, so when I play that 4 card game I often get frustrated because I am not so good at it."

Perhaps Marle didn't like the terms / the fees of the joint law suit, or she was turned down by them when she tried to join, or it could be her wanting the whole of a small pie rather than a small piece of a medium/large pie.

Will there being two almost identical lawsuits in motion at the same time effect the outcomes at all? Is it an advantage or a disadvantage to the defendant when this happens?

It must be a slow news day.

De Niro? Lawrence? Dicaprio? Ivey? No, CORDEIRO!

She's suing Postle for her lost winnings on that hand plus other unspecified damages.

Does it say how much actual damages were?

TMZ will hit a whole new audience with this. Will it matter. Probably not. But anything that outs our god is a good thing.

To follow up on Captain Jack's Twitter revelations last week. He continued some digging and found some interesting "coincidences" between Russ Hamilton, Postle, and a few other UBT Season 1 "internet qualifies" who we know were hand picked friends of his:

Ron Saccavino, implicated for operating two UB Super-user accounts, "FlipFlop2" and "HeadKase01"

Dennis Novinsky, also implicated as have operated a super-user account on UB by the name of "DannyBoy55"

Shawn Rice, who came to Postle's defense on 2+2 when this first broke.


Of course, this is not evidence that Postle had access to a super-user account. If is looks like a duck and quacks like a duck though.

White collar crime gets nothing. Unless it's pure fraud (eg. Madoff), bank execs who are full blown criminals get slaps on the wrist. Sell a bag of marijuana, 10 years in Rikers..

Bingo.

Most useful item in the thread.

Video of Mr. Rogers flipping off the kiddies.

preacher should have overbet, deservedly stacked

whats the latest on this postle thing???? surely the casino has to be held accountable . The memes they put were so insulting to the players.

Mike get there postle , the power of postle thinking

Veronica MVP

also are people boycotting Stones or is it business as usual?

What planet do you live on?

STONES GAMBLING HALL
TEMPORARY CLOSING
Following governmental guidelines to help fight the spread of the Coronavirus, we are currently closed.

ABOUT CLOSING
GO TO HOME PAGE

The Saloon at Stones Gambling Hall Ownership/Management

King's Casino, LLC (50% Owner)


King's Casino Management Corp. (50% Owner)

Definitely new information in these tweets but it should be noted that Postle's participation in Ultimate Blackjack was brought up ITT as early as October:

And previous to that when I mentioned Postle's Dream Seat Poker concept, a poster said it reminded him of Ultimate Blackjack:

I am curious.

Does anyone know of a casino being successfully sued by a customer that was robbed on their premise?

A maid ripped off my room years ago and they had no interest. They figured what is stolen in Vegas stays in Vegas.

From a theft lawsuit:

The defendant also argues Plaintiff’s complaint fails to plead facts that the presence of additional security measures would have, in fact, prevented the robbery. Therefore, Defendant contends it is only speculation that Defendant’s alleged breach of duty was the proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injuries.

PS: We hope to let you cheat again in a few months.

Technically, Stones is two establishments. The Saloon and The Tavern, each with its own gaming license.

Also, the King's Casino people (as Stones South Bay Corporation) own the Seven Mile Casino in Chula Vista

one casino in reno actually lost a big lawsuit for theft many years back. it seemed they had a string of breakin thefts and didnt notify the customers or do much about it. you now casinos.
jury ruled against them as they had a duty to their customers.