YESS JOEEEYY YESS! GIIIIEEEET'HIM!

well over a year or two ago, i blocked Veronica on twitter because i got tired of seeing her tweets because some of them were pro-satanist and they definitely offended my religious sensibilities. and she was publishing way too many of them, same reason i block many others. however ive looked at her tweets recently when it asked are u sure? reason is, no matter her beliefs, i definitely feel she did the right thing in bringing this to everyones attention and should be congratulated for speaking up. i hope stones management or ownership since they might be guilty in all this, dont retaliate against her for speaking up.

I'm interested to discover exactly how he cheated so lawyers and investigators can get all the evidence they need.

Indeed, yet they seem to be confident about the identity of John Doe. I have no idea how the legal system in California works, but that makes me wonder if there's an advantage to alleging uncertain facts to get the discovery proces going. Where I'm from that would definitely be a no go in your clients interest, but it might be different over there.

Based on the facts I would assume it's Taylor, but that doesn't align with the description of John Doe in the lawsuit at all. There it's said Mike played significantly less when John Doe wasn't around, yet Taylor commented on 7 episodes in the rare instances Mike wasn't playing.

Sure.

Taylor:



Justin:



And those took me 3 minutes to find, there are many more even outside the WSOP.

As far as Berky's fantastic video, with MP possibly having access to the backroom software with his Dream Seat stuff, would it be possible for him to have setup the repeat stream himself and it be permanently on?
Then when phones got banned he used his phone to convert other players holdings to text on his headphones?

Don't worry, she has satan on her side

Mike mostly played during the livestream, this was discussed earlier in the thread by others who played in the game. He would show up as the stream started and leave shortly after it ended.

+1

Another thing to note is if she did tell them on the car ride they probably would’ve told her not to go public yet and would’ve tried to find a way to catch him red handed and have 100% proof. Not saying Veronica wasn’t in an extremely tough position but to hate on Soto for feeling the way he does is crazy to me. Multiple posters have been mad at other commentators for bringing people into their 1/3 game where the people they brought in have been cheated let alone this high stakes game.

Hindsight is 20/20 and I’m not hating on Veronica. I’m just saying things could’ve been handled differently. I don’t know how I would’ve handled things if I was her so I’m not hating on her in any way.

Exactly, and neither should Soto. Which is exactly my point. Berkey was in the same car and does know how to react on the situation in a dignified way. You realize Veronica herself is a victim because she lost to Mike as well?

He added on $1500 at 4:24 of the stream. I put a comment on the spreadsheet.

Yes I realize that but I also realize people who are victims react in different ways. I don’t think Soto or Berkey are wrong for their reactions and how they’ve handled things even though they are vastly different.

In case you needed more Postle lols here's a hand where he has KK against Q5 that hasn't previously been documented on this thread.

https://youtu.be/9L6DueV9aHc?t=433

Spoiler alert:

Just reposting it if anyone wants the link to this stream.

Remember this was a July 2018 Stream before he perfected his ways. He was lazy here.

It's less than 12 shares of Amazon, 1/15th of a share of Berkshire Hathaway, or 2 and half bitcoins. It's not very much money at all. If he thinks it is a lot of money maybe he should start using other people's money instead. Berkey can drop a few hundred grand of someone else's money and it's just another day at the office for him.

this stream is being funny af. Definitely a must watch this live stream from JOE

May have been documented a little.

Very important tweet. Archived here in case Postle deletes it:
http://archive.fo/16BsR

I think you guys might be confusing the hate Veronica initially received on twitter, which was terrible to say the least as people have said some draw droppingly horrible and unspeakable things to and about her, vs a guy who is a little mad for not being told about being taken to a game with a suspected cheater in it. Its not like Soto is mad that she came forward, he commended her for it. He is mad that she didn't tell him. It is pretty much an unwritten rule, "bro code" or "poker player code" if you will, that if there is a suspected cheater in a game, you let your friends know. While I do not find it in good taste or wise that he vocalized this in a public format, the fact of the matter is, Veronica knew that there was a suspected cheater, she had the opportunity to tell him, and she didn't. Then in between the end of that session and her tweet, she asks them what they thought of Mike's cheating. It is my guess that she didn't tell them to get their unbiased opinion about whether she thought Postle was cheating. I am not mad at her for that, its not fair for her to be selective and only tell Berkey and Soto. I think it makes perfect sense that if she wasn't going to tell everyone, then she should tell no one until she is ready to go public. But I can be objective about it, Soto might not be able to, bc Soto had 20gs of his own money on the table. Look this case definitely expands beyond the scope of Berkey and Soto's single session with the cheater, who has stolen hundreds of thousands of dollars over the course of several months and thousands and thousands of hands. I'm not going to try to change your guy's opinions on the matter, I just want to put in a defense because what you guys are saying seems a little bit harsh and i think its less serious than you are making it out to be.

Looks like his phone has the blue screen of death.

There were talks early on in this thread, around the time that the Justin @ WSOP theory surfaced, that Mike didn't cheat when Justin was commentating. When Taylors name surfaced, there again was mention that Mike didn't cheat when Taylor was commenting. Not sure how this theory has been doing over time as it kind of got lost in all the new data flowing in, but that might be the reason why you see Mike not cheating when Mike and Taylor are around and commentating.

I have nothing substantive to add...some interesting take from the commentary booth:

"He's mike P. and you don't mess with mike P. because he knows where he's at. I just don't want to play against him ever, he too good, and I just feel he'll soul read me every time, and I'll always feel like the worst player ever."

Probably what it would be like if you were up against THE GAWD day in and out.

I think this is how most people who are defending Soto feel. It’s how I feel but you said it in a much better way than I did.

soft playing locals to the tune of $300k

Does anyone know whether Mike was using a Windows phone, or if there's some hack that allows Windows Media Player to run on Apple or Android? Or is it just MP4 or something?

It really doesn't matter. It doesn't have to be windows media player. Any smartphone could be very simply set up for that backdoor PokerGFX stream.

I am curious though, generally speaking, when can open insecure portals like Berkey explains, exposing a machine to the outside world, it's at least password protected. Does PokerGFX have that option?