Quote:
Originally Posted by soapdodger
There's a few issues with this (please see my post above #6025). Here's the main one though - J4o is shown as the hole cards right from the start of the hand. They do not change (unlike the 68o into 89s). How would the accomplice know to change them right from the start of the hand (even if that was possible).
Also ask; Why does Taylor voluntarily offer up information to comms at the end of the hand that MP has made an even more ridiculous fold?
+1
How does the accomplice know at the start of the hand that Mike will Mike an inexplicable fold, and the opponent needs to have J4 instead of JJ?
I'm aware of how much more complex the scam would have to be, but this is one instance that actually makes me think there were times when he knew the runouts.
What if the turn was a 4? Or a J? Or a board pair that makes a fold even more ridiculous, after the guy behind him has folded AK, and they're heads up.
The other hand that made it seem like he knew runouts was when he got all-in with a T hi flush draw against a bigger flush draw. He had I think T6cc, and there was a 7 and a 9 on the flop, with 2 clubs. Opponent had I think K4cc. They get all-in on the flop, run it twice, and a red 8 comes on both turns, no club on either river.
I mean, if that was the one time he decided to give some back, and he happened to hit 2 red 8s and dodge the flush, maybe we can't rule out God theory.