Quote:
Originally Posted by Monorail
Given your professional experience, what do you think? I.e. If the only evidence was the circumstantial stuff we currently know -- near-impossible winrate; hands played suspiciously, etc -- would that suffice for a prosecution?
No, you'd want more investigation first. But what we do know so far is almost certainly enough for any judge in the county to sign off on a search warrant for Mike's electronic devices, phone records, bank records, etc.
The DA's office doesn't generally jump in on it's own and file charges. They receive a report of a crime from a Law Enforcement or Administrative Agency that's done an investigation and is recommending prosecution. If such a report were submitted containing only the publicly-known facts at this point, the DA would tell them to go get more evidence. Interviews, search warrants, etc.
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk