Quote:
Originally Posted by SimpleRick
Yeah I'm sure casinos wouldn't care that Mike Postle cheated players and circumvented casino security to do so. They welcome such players! They want to be sued for millions! I'm sure they would love the publicity allowing a known cheater to play at their casino would bring.
I've only been playing poker since 2003. Did the Ultimate Bet cheating scandal get national coverage? Or Michael Borovetz? No. Full Tilt's insolvency and inability to pay players was part of the larger black friday situation.
You couldn't be more wrong.
I was once at a 20/40 limit table at a local cardroom when the player in seat 9 spit on the player in seat 8 after seat 8 invoked IWTSTH.
Seat 9 was barred for a year. He served out that time and then came back, and now is back to being a regular player in the room.
As a lawyer, I can tell you that the liability issues there are serious. If seat 9 ever assaults another player again, there's a plausible lawsuit against the casino. And yet, they let him play.
Cardrooms, in my experience, do not care nearly as much as they should about liability concerns arising from known dangerous players. My guess is managers operate from the premise that poker is full of scummy people and they aren't going to start kicking all of them out.