Quote:
Originally Posted by SimpleRick
As far as I can tell the martingale strategy in poker is to just keep matching the largest stack and having a larger bankroll. Basically just as fundamentally flawed as the real martingale strategy is. Only an idiot would say something so foolish as Mike has a martingale strategy for poker.
Justin Kuraitis might be a high functioning ****** that no one has realized until now. That's my theory. Just look at how he speaks and his mannerisms. IQ~70 tournament director. Reminds me of Officer Doofy from the movie scream.
Rick, happy to help with a clear guide to martingale. in full generality, a stochastic process Y : T × Ω → S is a martingale with respect to a filtration Σ and probability measure P if Σ∗ is a filtration of the underlying probability space (Ω, Σ, P); Y is adapted to the filtration Σ∗, i.e., for each t in the index set T, the random variable Yt is a Σt-measurable function;for each t, Yt lies in the Lp space L1(Ω, Σt, P; S), i.e.
E P ( | Y t | ) < + ∞ ; {E} _{\mathbf {P} }(|Y_{t}|)<+\infty ;}
But Rick, it is important to note that the property of being a martingale involves both the filtration and the probability measure (with respect to which the expectations are taken). It is possible that Y could be a martingale with respect to one measure but not another one; the Girsanov theorem offers a way to find a measure with respect to which an Itō process is a martingale.
So Postle's use of the Girsanov therem should not be underestimated, for reasons that are all too apparent.
So Veronica is a forgetful liar, and JFK is an undiagnosed ******. Your shrewd analysis will hopefully be called upon when this goes to court, and you can quiz the judge on their latent acute paranaschitis.