Quote:
Originally Posted by SimpleRick
Yeah that doesnt mean he's not wrong. I also doubt the ever growing winnings of Mike Postle. 250k, 300k, 350k. Next thing we hear it's going to be a million. And how is he being conservative with his estimate? What does that even mean? Accounting for rebuys that he doesn't even see?
Look at the spreadsheet for 12/17/18. ZERO ADDONS. When we can see three times at least that he has added on. How is that being conservative??
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=2044248290
I wonder who has the burden of proof for the win rate and addons.
If the defense proves one or more of VerStandigs accounts of Postles winings are off, will the court find that they are all potentially wrong? If so, whos numbers do they even go by, Postle can't just throw out a single number and hope it sticks, he has to give exact numbers, which, as a professional poker player, he should have exact dates, times and locations. Plus, hes contradicted himself with his win rates in the past as he is on record for saying hes had a win rate of 900bb/100 on a tweet pre crotchgate.
So I don't think it will go down in court the way you guys are describing. The plaintiffs will have access to Mike Postles records and can cross reference them with their own and object to any misfilings.
btw, the DOJ is on the case and Im pretty sure Postle is going to have the IRS so far up his ass hes not going to want to lie about any of this, at least not in court since things have gotten way more serious since the Matusow interview. And if he is stupid enough to lie, he'll get caught and get doubly ****ed. I mean, hes already gone on record for saying hes hidden his internet and casino winnings to avoid paying taxes, is he really dumb enough to lie while under investigation? probably lol