Lol you guys check out this move at 4:17:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6w4TguWyUH0

Guys, I think I might be in love with Veronica Brill, aka THE GOD KILLER, aka Veronica Mars, aka Veronica 2.0, aka Angry_Polak, aka Women in Tech, aka Women in Poker, aka Savior of Poker.

Here is where he talks about it:



1:20:55 in case it doesn't start right.

From ~01:24:00:




Yet another "pretend to look at my cards" move.

Super common for a defendant (especially the biggest one in the suit) to try and end around the lawyers and get this down behind closed doors. It’s in their best interest to try and settle with as many potential plaintiffs as possible in this manner

Not strange at all. Any lawsuit filed can easily be dropped if the parties negotiate a settlement. And "settle" basically means whatever the parties negotiate and agree to: they might (definitely will) put it in writing and might even (definitely will) call it something like a settlement agreement. It happens all the time.

He is going for $10,000,000 punitive.

Not that there has been any doubt, but if this is true, can take this as confirmation that there was cheating going down.

Just looked for one second and see some comments in chat from the vocal terror in re: Mike being on multiple devices at the table:

Moderatorcheer 1VocalTerror:no phones mic!
Moderatorcheer 1VocalTerror:mike*
ModeratorJimmybluffett:@vocalterror yo...👊
ModeratorJimmybluffett:he just "postleing"
Moderatorcheer 1VocalTerror:hes on like 8 devices.

Remember vocal terror is one of the graphics guys, and is either lance or taylor. (I get them mixed up.)

If you believe there was cheating and if you believe Stones was involved in it; what difference does it make whether there is a settlement or if it goes to trial or even what the verdict of a trial may be? Most people believe what they believe, and that belief probably won't change whether Stones settles or not.

https://www.barstoolbets.com/blogs/1...he-is-innocent

By the way, the "reflection of the screen on his glasses" thing is very real and very incriminating. He loves to hang his glasses off his shirt, and the bottom lens is often reflecting his phone, which is always on the BSOD when he is in God mode.

Which means he isn't watching sports or playing Candy Crush on the thing.

I haven’t listened to Joey’s podcast with Veronica yet, but, if they are reaching out to players talking about any sort of settlements/ reimbursements/ compensation it is because their internal investigation has confirmed cheating was going on. They absolutely would not be doing that unless that’s the case.

*if they’re reaching out to players to talk to/interview, that is different.

People can believe whatever they want. If they don’t believe cheating was going on, they don’t know anything about poker. If there’s a settlement/verdict stipulating cheating was going on & they still don’t want to believe it, then they are just straight fools.

I have read earlier in the thread that it's Taylor.

And also I haven't had the chance to reach out to Mike yet in this thread or elsewhere but I'm think it's about time I did.

This is NSFW but I do think it is important that I mention this to him:


https://youtu.be/duvRY76UFlo?t=25

Ok. Link sessions and hands where Postle clearly cheated.

I play online based pretty much solely for my intuition. Timing tells are big factor for my decision for example. A lot more tells in live games.

If player wins like 19/20 sessions it does not say a thing. Pretty common variance if number of winning sessions is like 75%ish, which is probable quite close for good winning player live session winrate.

I watched that one 5h session where Postle booked 22k$ win. I would give him 1k$ hourly there. Some good variance, and then 10k$ donations since his opponents adapted poorly to his style. Nothing special. 400bb winning session in game with antes. Zero hands where there were some clear cheating going on. Nothing totally out of ordinary. Just very solid poker.

Postle was not even best player in that table. Second best, though best hourly in that table.

He has 1.9 million followers. lol

If he linked to this thread, this site would shut down.

5:04:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6w4TguWyUH0

Kind of interesting. Postle folds A8o on the button which seems flat out bizarre when its folded to him. He leaves the table. at 5:04:27 you can see him near Justin's office talking to someone, possibly Justin. Comes back to the table. I wonder what hes talking about. Could be absolutely nothing, but I figured I'd mention it.

The issue is you are assuming they are reaching out because their own investigation found evidence of cheating. I don't know if that is the case or not. What I can say confidentially is that a business will do what is in their best interests: and sometimes that means settling out of court vs having to deal with a lawsuit that will take who knows how long. There is a belief that court is risky; because you cannot control the outcome, whereas a negotiated settlement gives a business some level of control as to the outcome. Uncertainty is always more risky than certainty: and some are willing to pay for certainty rather than roll the dice on an uncertain outcome.

Question: Can anyone identify a time before 4:16:00 in this stream where Postle appears to have his phone in his lap? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6w4TguWyUH0

I should mention. I was in Walmart today and cruised over to the sunglass section. There were several blue lensed sunglasses. Earlier in the thread when this sunglass reflection issue came up some thought that the blue hue of the sunglasses was the reason the screen appeared blue. I tried several reflections of different sunglasses in my iphone (which apparently Mike used) and even those blue shades reflected the exact face of my screen and not a hue blue reflection.

So the blue reflection has everything to do with his cell phone screen and nothing to do with the color of his sunglasses lens.

Cue ZZ Top.

Talking some generic business concept, sure, agree with you. In this specific situation that would make zero sense. Stand by my assumption.

Are you ****ing stupid?

Thank you for doing this. Watching these videos, I think its very hard to tell when hes cheating or not. I think rather than have one person investigate and say god mode on or off, you should ask for what the probability they think he cheated during the session. I think this will be useful information and will prevent false positives.