Quote:
Originally Posted by a dewd
Why? That pretty much neutralizes the entire whistleblower policy. The players would get paid back and damages. They'd have $0 money recovered if not for her. $0.00 They should be offering her something, not taking from her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark1980
Did Veronica quit on her own accord? Or was she basically told to resign? If she was let go for being a whistleblower, she definitely should be compensated.
I believe she quit right before releasing the tweet. But what is she getting paid like $10/hr? I think she quit her dealer job there like a 1.5 yrs ago so it was more like a social hobby that she got paid a little bit for.
Imagine regs on the stream. Not only are they losing thousands and thousands, they aren't getting the money they may have won on the session, they incur phycological damage, their mental game suffers, they could go on major downswings off stream questioning their game and switching it up for the worse, they could gamble on the side to try and get their losses back an incur more losses.
Veronica also brought players to these games without telling them their was a suspected cheater in it. But its less about whether she deserves it or not and more about it being the right thing to do to donate it to the players. Who knows if theyll ever see a dime and whether she'll ever see a dime. I've always defended and commended her for what she did but I would lose all respect if she kept any money she may or may not receive. I dont really want to argue about this since its all just speculation at this point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
Absolutely not. Quite the opposite actually. If they get money back they should be paying her a cut.
Absolutely not. You want Berkey and Soto to pay her a cut when she could have told them she was driving them to a game with a superuser? Hey, you didn't tell me about the super user in the 2hr car ride we had together, but here's 40% of the money I lost to the cheater.