It's like the posters here can actually see his hole cards.

Not as funny as the people still defending him after 700 posts ITT and Joey going through 5 hours of footage.

Appreciate you posting this, and I personally have zero knowledge of how RFID tech works.

However, what I do know: I've played on the Stones Live Stream multiple times (with Postle in the game every time lol) and cards have definitely been misread.

One example:



In this hand, I (Sammy) actually had QJ and Dave C had A-Jos (the hand went to showdown). As you can see, the card-readers have it completely wrong.

Link to the stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iajF2_mLyts
This hand occurs at 1:16:00


That said, if this is accurate:




.. it's the most damning piece of evidence we've seen. Those figures are literally beyond impossible.

Hi Mike

1/3 36k 52 hours , must be softest game in history?

Just because I said that it sounds like jealousy to me, does not mean I lean one way or the other. Quite the opposite actually. My point is that we should not speak with absolute certain about a subject without having a full understanding of the situation.

Also, I never claimed he solved the game either, you misunderstood. What I meant was that it's important to confront our perception of how much we know before assuming something is wrong.

and thats just 2018 results. .. we're through 9 months of 2019 LOL

Are you ****ing serious.

I tried archiving the page before he edits it but "this website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks".

Loool it's not even 200 bb/100. It's 200 bb/hr! Given that each hand is like 6 ways it's probably like 15-20 hands an hr. Solid 1000 bb/100 wr

You could do this anywhere if you knew your opponents hole cards or if you used a gun.

His brother is claiming right now he plays big games and wins with players like Phil Laak.. haha if I heard that right.

This table chatter is gold. Have it blasted right now but his brother is whispering

lol at the mental midgets in this thread that think he isnt cheating in some capacity.

There is AI out there designed for making decisions based on game theory. As a demonstration and for press, they had an exhibition where it was taught the rules of poker and played millions and millions of hands against itself to prepare to play against the top HU NL online players in the world, Doug Polk included. It beat them. It solved HU NL holdem. However, this required machinery the size of a poker room and millions and millions of dollars a month to run and could not be employed in anything other than HU because there were just too many decision points in multiplayer. Maybe it could do it now, or someday, but it wouldn't be monetarily feasible. Not to, mention, it could be applied to much greater things than poker.

You're telling me that Mike ****ing Postle has solved the game of poker and is better than this AI? He is a god among men, the GOAT OF GOATS? Please...

I've been lucky/skilled enough to have a few 20 session winning streaks (humblebrag). The thing is, in low stakes you just don't run good from insane bluffs. If you're in a soft game/crushing/running good at low stakes, it is largely because you are making hands. I have never seen a player in history "run good" by being 100% accurate with bluffing on later streets as their main source of profit and achieving 200+bb/hour from this. It is literally impossible to believe by anyone who has even played 10 hours of live poker.

If Mike was "running good" from coolering people at a higher rate, or getting dumped too, that would be one thing. Pulling off insane bluffs for the majority of your win rate is not only unsustainable, it is legitimately impossible in a fair game.

I had a bet where the goal was to play 100,000 hands without having a losing session. I made it like 70k hands before I completely ****ed up a winning session and punted the bet. The general consensus at that point was that I was a lock to win the bet. Its certainly less likely to pull off live, considering a 12 hour session is like 300 hands, but its not impossible since most of the players are probably garbage.

Anyways, the posted hands are pretty red flag. Its one thing to pull all the **** off a few times, but he seems to have a 90% soul read accuracy.

Interestingly enough, this ****er right here could teach yall a thing or two about never losing a session.

damn got banned from twitch chat for typing "no postleripper?"

Im telling you, hes either solved the game or hes cheating. if you think there is any other possibility, you'r opinion does not matter

if you don't get banned from stones poker chat then honestly you're not doing it right

You should read my post again. Unfortunately, you have misread and misinterpreted what was said.

I got banned twice

The psychology of falsely accused innocent people is quite lost on you two

Please tell me you don’t put him in the likely innocent category?

lol to be fair it kind of is. every hand is played absolutely absurd by almost every player. the only reason he is considered more absurd is because he wins every hand. the villains play just as crazy as he does. they just lose to him cause he's super-using.

4-way guy just leads out 97 no fd, no equity basically on qq52, 3-bets against mike when he raises. squeezing 92s random sizings and betting no equity on the flop. the a9o vs a3o hand where the guy 3bet, bet flop, x/r turn with nothing, bet call river with a9o high etcetc lol. ppl calling, then calling more = 45BB with 84o preflop. just putting in tonnes of money 5-ways postflop with random hands, gutshots, you name it.
almost every hand is like that.

it's kinda like that that saying you know, you put 100 monkeys in a room, one of them will write shakespeare

Ill say it again, if you disagree with the premise that Postle has either solved poker or is superusing, there is no point in talking to you. Occams razor says hes cheating.

Going live again in 15 for more HH reviews - going over the session Loctus posted ITT