Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Maurice Hawkins experience at k NLHE WSOP today Maurice Hawkins experience at k NLHE WSOP today

06-18-2014 , 05:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dantes
It's a called hand, she should turn it over. He paid to see it and she wants to muck and still make him show. Bad etiquette.
Just curious have you played any WSOP events this summer? Maria can muck her hand, there is no angleshoot, shes not attempting to win the hand in any way. I literally have seen this scenario at least 100 times already this summer. It was a slight dealer error, but who cares. OP freaked out b/c it wasn't mucked... OK.. Its not Marias fault.
06-18-2014 , 05:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by charder30
Just curious have you played any WSOP events this summer? Maria can muck her hand, there is no angleshoot, shes not attempting to win the hand in any way. I literally have seen this scenario at least 100 times already this summer. It was a slight dealer error, but who cares. OP freaked out b/c it wasn't mucked... OK.. Its not Marias fault.
The 'must show hand to win pot' rule should stipulate only if two players are remaining in the hand to avoid the open muck exploit. It may not be an angle shoot but it's exploiting one of the dumbest rules on the books - that you can open muck after the river instead of showing down and still get to see your opponent's cards.

Edit: Actually as the rule is written Maria CANNOT muck her hand without violating the rule and should receive a penalty.

Last edited by DoGGz; 06-18-2014 at 05:54 AM.
06-18-2014 , 05:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goobenstein
Rule 71. Showdown: In a non all-in showdown, if cards are not spontaneously tabled, the Floor People may enforce an order of show. The last aggressive
player on the final betting round (final street) must table first. If there was no bet on the final street, then the player who would be first to act in a
betting round must table first (i.e. first seat left of the button in flop games, high hand showing in stud, low hand showing in razz, etc.) Players not
still in possession of their cards at showdown, or who have mucked face down without tabling their cards, lose any rights or privileges they may
have to ask to see any hand. The winning hand must be shown to claim the pot. If a participant refuses to show their hand and intentionally mucks
his or her hand, the participant in violation will receive a penalty, in accordance with Rules 39, 107 and 108.
Ironically Maria was in violation of this rule. As the rule is written, if you muck the river when you should table it you are in violation. I'm not arguing that this is how the rule is enforced, but as it is written the open muck exploit should be penalized.

Quote:
The last aggressive player on the final betting round (final street) must table first. ... If a participant refuses to show their hand and intentionally mucks
his or her hand, the participant in violation will receive a penalty, in accordance with Rules 39, 107 and 108.
06-18-2014 , 06:11 AM
I have known Maurice since 2006 when I met him at the Seminole Hard Rock in Hollywood Fl - back then you could only play sngs and cash games with a max buy-in of $100 I believe. Maurice would grind all different amounts of the sngs however he usually played the $500's and $1000's.

To sum up Maurice and I think I am being pretty accurate:

1)If he doesn't know you and you are not a "well known" pro, he will initially treat you like crap(always exceptions but not too often). He will criticize your game, try to embarrass you at the table and generally hope you play badly because of it. Maurice imo has a unique style and part of his style incorporates his table talk/image. The Jeopardy theme song hum by him is well thought out because ultimately he wants the op to act faster and get him annoyed and off his game in the process. I believe Will "The Thrill" is another guy who uses his table talk in a different way but also has some similarities to Maurice - he will be very loud and sometimes obnoxious to push people to call his big shoves(when he usually has the nuts or close to it).

2)Once you get to know Maurice and he has played with you before, he doesn't act like that anymore for the most part. He will be very friendly and affable with you at the table - almost building a hush hush alliance where he is overly friendly, not wanting to have you go against him. Believe me when I write this, Maurice would be a great politician - he can make you feel like you and him are best friends at the table in no time.

Overall, definitely sorry OP had the "bad" Maurice experience but believe me when I tell you this(and you already know this from other posts about him), you are not even close to being the only one he has done this to.

Maurice Hawkins is an acquired taste - I am very friendly with him and am that way because I know he won't do that crap to me anymore(he did back in '06). He also knows exactly what he is doing with each and every player at the table to get any kind of edge he can in the psychological sense. This year he finished 1st in the 1 million Guarantee $580 circuit event in February at the Palm Beach Kennel Club for $160,000+, he made a semi deep run I believe at the Borgata WPT $15,000 main event in April and he finished 9th in the Milly Maker a few weeks ago for another 6 figure score. Don't expect him to change his table presence anytime soon.
06-18-2014 , 06:38 AM
Hollywood
06-18-2014 , 06:56 AM
As a pro playing a big event I'd chew Maurice out for poor behaviour and give him some stick afterwards, then not call clock on him later.

As an amateur, as above, but then I'd call clock on him as you did, OP.

Your case is made weaker for the Maria stuff but then again I can see how you'd see things like that.
06-18-2014 , 07:17 AM
Im a plo cash reg from miami florida and didnt ever experience maurice hawkins **** talking till i started playing live mtts about 6 months ago and the guy is clearly out of line. im always nice to everyone at the table and i usually keep to myself but this guy constantly crosses the line. The ego on this guy is pathetic he is also completely full of himself. I know for a fact prior to his palm beach score he was broke. I remember being in a hialeah park playing 10/25 plo and he was coming over to my table to get stake money for 2/5 nl from a fish/thug in my game. And from what i heard from a friend in the 2/5 nl game with maurice hawkins the guy is a huge mark. this guy obviously just went on a mtt heater. But in a year or two he will be back to strolling around the casinos in miami looking for someone to put him into a 2/5 nl game.
06-18-2014 , 07:44 AM
Well played. If someone calls the clock on me after such a short period of time I will spite call clock all day long after that. Only thing missing from this story was you slow rolling him with the nuts when he shoves all in.
06-18-2014 , 07:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSUMike1999
Maurice is only an ******* to new players/fish but it's ok because he's very friendly with grinders at his table to try and get them to soft play against him.
just made a tl;dr FYP

amazed that one of his poker buddies hasn;t said "Hey Maurice, maybe it's a good idea to make new/bad players WANT to come back and put some money in the poker economy.
06-18-2014 , 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by epcfast
D_Matthews winning this thread easily.
Seems like a decent bloke.
+1, guy seems alright. i'm gonna automatically side with him because i can't stand the way that scrubs angle to try and keep from having to show their hands when their bluffs get called down.

OP, i'm sorry that these clowns made your experience such a trying ordeal. you were absolutely in the right in all of the described incidents, and i can confirm from experience that 1) wsop dealers are terrible, unlike anything in this world, and 2) there are tons of circuit travelling "pros" (mostly a bunch of backed wannabes who really aren't even good at poker) who most definitely share a cliquey/high school mentality where they think they're cool because they travel around to play poker and they go out of their way to treat anybody who isn't part of their "in crowd" like a lowlife peasant.

try not to let it discourage you, unfortunately part of playing live poker is having to find a way to deal with scumbags who act like children.
06-18-2014 , 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
I asked Maria about this incident today.

Confirmed angle shoot. Also like the part where Ho is not obligated (agreed) to speak up when another player is acting out, but is obligated to defend a dealer who is not going his/her job in a professional manner, of which actions were directly caused by Ms Ho and her "unclear" fold.
06-18-2014 , 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maria_Ho
useless wall of text
blah ****ing blah

your bet was called, table your ****ing hand like a professional is supposed to.
06-18-2014 , 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyfan420
Confirmed angle shoot. Also like the part where Ho is not obligated (agreed) to speak up when another player is acting out, but is obligated to defend a dealer who is not going his/her job in a professional manner, of which actions were directly caused by Ms Ho and her "unclear" fold.
I actually find this interesting.

She goes out of her way to be uber PC about how her and Maurice are totally not friends and basically says she doesn't need to do anything to help out random guy when her not friend is being a total dick. But she goes out of her way to say OP is a dick to the dealer who everyone here seems to think was totally incompetent.
06-18-2014 , 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrindPokerAllDay
She didn't say she mucked her hand because she didn't. That isn't the player's job. That is the dealer's job.
Once it's obvious the dealer doesn't know she has mucked it is her job to clarify that she's just holding her cards in hopes of getting information from him while concealing her own. It's within the rules and bad form, pretty much the definition of angleshooting.
06-18-2014 , 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LimpDitka
No idea who Maurice Hawkins is but when I looked him up, he indeed looks like a big tool.
racist ban imo
06-18-2014 , 10:31 AM
and selbst coming in here pulling the sexism card when her friend is clearly angleshooting is utter bs. D Negs doesnt pull this crap, hence why hes a great ambassador to the game.
06-18-2014 , 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCHAK
It sounds like she did what a lot of people do that don't want to show their hand, the say "you win" and wait till their opponent turns over their hand before mucking, this is BS, either show your hand or fold it, enough with this pushing your hand 1 centimeter forward making it ambiguous to the dealer and then demanding to see your opponents hand, that's a straight up angle shot, especially if it's a timid amateur dealer scared to death to make a mistake, they will never grab your hand from right in front of you. She says she "verbally conceded the pot" what is she talking about? By her statements it's obvious it was an unconventional "fold", I mean she had to clarify that it was "verbally conceded". Fold your hand, throw it to the muck, once it's in the muck then you can ask about your opponent's hand. This behavior wastes time and if the dealer doesn't drag the cards into the muck because they are still in front of you where a live hand would be, it's an angle shot that exploits less assertive dealers. She seems like a nice person but wtf was she trying to do by not throwing her hand into the muck and instead "verbally conceding" while her cards were "within reach of the dealer", seriously what was she doing? Was she trying to needle him? Angle shoot him?

I've been burned at the WSOP by a similar situation and the OP is within his rights and actually should wait till the dealer drags her hand into the muck before tabling his hand. Last year at the WSOP I was in the BB, the SB completed and the hand was checked all the way to the river when the SB open folded his hand by throwing towards the muck. Someone then said a winning hand has to be shown so I turned my hand over for the nut low 23, the SB had folded 24 so it would have been a chopped pot, but he already folded.

As soon as I showed my hand, the SB grabs his cards and turns them over to show the 24 for a chop. The dealer starts pushing me the pot and the SB protests, a floor is called and the floor declares the SB hand is dead and to push me the pot.

Two minutes and several hands later the floor comes back and reverses the decision saying he checked with his supervisor and since the dealer hadn't dragged the hand to the muck it was still a live hand. He then made me give the amount of 1/2 the pot to the SB. I couldn't believe it but according to WSOP, unless your hand is actually in the muck, it's still live.

It wasn't a big pot but since then, if a player doesn't want to show their hand due to embarrassment or range protection, I wait till the dealer drags the hand to the muck before tabling my hand as required. If you don't want to get angle shot, intentionally or otherwise, in a marginal situation you should do the same. If they want to open muck, make them open muck completely.
This happens all the time. Someone "folds" by saying something like "you got it" or by slightly pushing their cards over the line (still within reach) and when the other player shows a worse hand the first player grabs their hand back and turns it up, which usually ends up in a rewarded pot.

This is 100% the dealer's fault in this situation, as she should have pulled Maria's hand into the muck and pushed the pot over.

Also, in the video Maria says that WSOP rules say that you have to show the winning hand whether or not it's an all in situation. Can someone confirm this? I was pretty sure that if you are heads up, and a player mucks, the other player does not need to show their hand to be awarded the pot.
06-18-2014 , 10:39 AM
Tournament poker sounds fun and friendly.
06-18-2014 , 10:41 AM
this isnt even about Maria. Its about Maurice. Maria could have been a solid example and told Maurice to tone it down. Negs would. Marias whole ordeal could have been avoided had she just threw her damn cards into the muck, like a previous poster stated. No point in verbally saying ur good. Toss the cards, gg, nh. Next hand. Cmon
06-18-2014 , 11:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fslexcduck
So you make a post and describe what Maurice did wrong, mention nothing that Maria did wrong other than bet a hand, and somehow part of this thread turns into denigrating Maria? Maria is an awesome poker player and person and it's really annoying that some f you make certain assumptions based on how she looks and her gender. It really is amazing to me that some people still think there isn't sexism in poker.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fslexcduck
I just wanted to clarify what is sexist for people that claim I "always cry sexism."

Sexism = assuming Maria gets her money from sources other than poker. This assumption is routinely made about women and very rarely about men to a hugely disproportionate degree.

Sexism = singling out Maria for behavior like "sneering" and not calling out Maurice for his behavior. What about all the other guys at the table? It's just annoying for people like Maria when she comports herself extremely well 99.9% of the time, but then the one time she does something that someone doesn't like, lo and behold, it's in a twoplustwo thread. This is obviously a double standard that people highly scrutinize the behavior of women like it is their duty to make everyone feel extremely welcome as if they are the poker hostesses rather than just players themselves. If you don't agree, it's just because you're not paying attention.
Vanessa, I don't fully agree (and I believe I am paying attention). I should clarify that I do agree with you that poker is full of blatant sexism, way beyond what would be tolerated in the corporate world or any normal work environment. Also, 2+2 (including itt) is infused with sexism to such an extent that most people don't seem to notice it. However, I just don't think OP criticising Maria in his account is an example of that. Note that Melanie was also a female at the table who he didn't materially criticise and for all I know there could have been others. Note also that it was not OP who made the comments about the source of Maria's money. Therefore I don't think its fair to say she was singled out by OP because of her gender. OP had reasons (from his pov) to include her in his story:

Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Matthews
Anyway, there's a clique in poker. Maria Ho and Maurice obviously thought they were both superior to everyone else. They laughed and chided me and thought it was fine to break rules and etiquette because they're just that far superior to the peasants that troll these games like me.

There were a few other people at the table that refused to say a word in the tournament, but on the break they told me I was right on everything I said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Matthews
Maria was quite unpleasant to me. She sneered at me when I disputed Maurice's behavior. She chided me for my criticism of a dealer. It was more of a passive aggressive thing though with her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Matthews
Maria was quite supportive of Maurice through this whole thing... you can only assume that part of it was friendship and part of it was he was making my thought process difficult when she was making a river bet. No I don't think she's innocent here. I was trying to decide to call, raise, or fold. All valid options, and he was singing his guts out the whole time. She thought it was comical, and no doubt enjoyed the distraction. You read people in poker. My read was she thought I was a jerk, and she was happy for any difficulty Maurice would introduce.
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Matthews
Yes I think Maria could have changed things. If she had told Maurice he was out of line he might have started to behave... but honestly, she seemed really perturbed about my call with T9 on a board of 98654. In fact, I think it pissed her off. Pretty much there's a club .. she's a member... Maurice is a member... I'm not a member.
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Matthews
Maria rolled her eyes.. and looked at Maurice, and cajoled everyone into looking at me as the bad guy...

I was a jerk because I wouldn't turn my hand over even though I was calling a bet with a weak holding in position where every single possible definition defines me as being able to reveal my hand after my opponent.

Essentially, Maria did not want to be embarrassed by showing the hand that she bet with, so I'm an ******* for forcing her to show her hand or muck it.. or forcing the dealer to muck it... or something...
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Matthews
The bigger problem for me was the "Jeopardy" hand that she was in. She seemed to enjoy Maurice's actions and certainly did not tell him to stop. After the hand it was business as usual with smiles and laughs all around. Here online she says that she felt Maruice was wrong in what he did, but when we were at the table, you would have thought that they were best friends for years. She certainly did not speak up about that at the time.

I was alone on an island on that table. I mention Maria and Melanie more to give authenticity to my story and also to explain why I think Maurice was so insufferable. I think the girls at the table put him into overdrive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Matthews
The bigger problem for me was the "Jeopardy" hand that she was in. She seemed to enjoy Maurice's actions and certainly did not tell him to stop. After the hand it was business as usual with smiles and laughs all around. Here online she says that she felt Maruice was wrong in what he did, but when we were at the table, you would have thought that they were best friends for years. She certainly did not speak up about that at the time.

I was alone on an island on that table. I mention Maria and Melanie more to give authenticity to my story and also to explain why I think Maurice was so insufferable. I think the girls at the table put him into overdrive.
If there is to be a complaint about sexism by OP then inclusion of Melanie who had no part in the story apart from being part of some supposed "clique" and her presence being a suggested reason why Maurice (who I don't know but sounds like a tool) was playing up. Also, this quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Matthews
Honestly Melanie seemed nice... I don't know her from anything.. and yes.. the cleavage was pleasant... and intentional on her part as she said to us...
If there is any OP sexism in respect of Maria then it is far milder than that I imagine she (sadly) encounters every day at the poker table. The interview she and Melanie did is more sexist than anything OP has said.

btw, I do agree that it is ridic for OP to criticise Maria for not speaking out against Maurice, and to that extent he singled her out.

I have great respect for you Vanessa and believe you do a lot to promote the interests of women in poker. I also agree with the thrust of your views about sexism. Having played poker with her only a few times I also agree that Maria is a very pleasant person and a strong poker player and has always acted very professionally in my experience. She is extremely popular with the other players as well as the peeps holding cameras. As you can see, I agree with you on a lot more points than I do not. I just feel sexism by OP is the wrong battle to fight.
06-18-2014 , 11:07 AM
behind op 100%, definitely think the spiteful 2minute clock call was warranted. The river check check thing needs to be cleared up, extremely muddy subject and etiquette changes from area to area/ country to country. Would have probably got a slap if you asked for an automucked river bluff to be turned over in london a decade ago.

Different but awesome situation postsaver http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr2agX80ZyE
06-18-2014 , 11:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyrochaos
Also, in the video Maria says that WSOP rules say that you have to show the winning hand whether or not it's an all in situation. Can someone confirm this? I was pretty sure that if you are heads up, and a player mucks, the other player does not need to show their hand to be awarded the pot.
2014 WSOP, Rule 71: http://www.wsop.com/2014/2014-WSOP-Rules.pdf

Showdown: In a non all-in showdown, if cards are not spontaneously tabled, the Floor People may enforce an order of show. The last aggressive player on the final betting round (final street) must table first. If there was no bet on the final street, then the player who would be first to act in a betting round must table first (i.e. first seat left of the button in flop games, high hand showing in stud, low hand showing in razz, etc.) Players not still in possession of their cards at showdown, or who have mucked face down without tabling their cards, lose any rights or privileges they may have to ask to see any hand. The winning hand must be shown to claim the pot. If a participant refuses to show their hand and intentionally mucks his or her hand, the participant in violation will receive a penalty, in accordance with Rules 39, 107 and 108.
06-18-2014 , 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerr
2014 WSOP, Rule 71: http://www.wsop.com/2014/2014-WSOP-Rules.pdf

Showdown: In a non all-in showdown, if cards are not spontaneously tabled, the Floor People may enforce an order of show. The last aggressive player on the final betting round (final street) must table first. If there was no bet on the final street, then the player who would be first to act in a betting round must table first (i.e. first seat left of the button in flop games, high hand showing in stud, low hand showing in razz, etc.) Players not still in possession of their cards at showdown, or who have mucked face down without tabling their cards, lose any rights or privileges they may have to ask to see any hand. The winning hand must be shown to claim the pot. If a participant refuses to show their hand and intentionally mucks his or her hand, the participant in violation will receive a penalty, in accordance with Rules 39, 107 and 108.
Thanks. So it is on the dealer to fully muck a mucked hand. Or her hand should have been declared dead and OP could have shown anyways.
06-18-2014 , 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroRoller
A large number of you are missing OP's point and arguing over the minutiae.

Cliffs for those that won't read below or will misread it. OP is complaining that he had a ****ty time at a tournament due to a bad dealer, bad floor and the some of the pros at the table... Something that seems to be a very common thread lately.

Some dude, who I guess is relatively unknown I guess, sits down at his table at a tournament and is seated with 3 people he recognizes. This should be an exciting experience for him. Though OP doesn't seem like a complete noob many people are and this is the type of situation they dream of when they register for a tournament, especially if it's they're first time.

Instead of plunking down a buy-in and having a good time, which to be honest, is what a lot of amateurs are happy to come away with, he has to deal with this bull****. Minus the blow ups from the people amateurs would love to get a blow up from, like Helmuth, people should be more or less respectful of not only the other players but the rules, which this jackass appears not to have been.

And I don't think OP was expecting Maria Ho to be his white knight but it kinda sucks to see someone being buddy buddy with a guy that's being a prick to you Especially if you're a bit excited to be playing at the same table with. I don't know about nayone else but I have no problem telling my friends, acquantainces, perfect strangers, heck even my own mom if they're acting like jerks. At the very least I would think a decent person would want to distance themselves from that behavior.

Dudes, being harassed, floors not doing **** except giving the jackass repeated warnings and giving him a warning too. On top of that dealer doesn't do a good job in that hand and OP knows enough that some people angle exactly like this. Saying something non enforceable like "It's yours" while your hand is can still be considered technically live OP has every right to want to wait until her hand is either shown or mucked. Seeing the guy's been having such a crappy time with the dirtbag, I can't see myself piling on top of him by giving him a hard time over this and I think it was poor form for Maria Ho to do so.

Why would a recreational player want to plunk down down his hard earned (dead) money to experience this?

On top of all that he posts his experience here and has to deal with more bull**** like being accused of being sexist by another tourney reg and friend of Maria Ho's when nothing he said appears to be that. Though that can not be said for other replies in this thread.

It's not just this thread but other threads and other things I've been reading and hearing sound like live tournaments are becoming experiences not worth the cost of admission.
This is easily the best post of the thread.
06-18-2014 , 11:35 AM
what kind of scumbag is doing everything in his power to make the recreationnal player feel bullied/unconfortable. It was obvious OP was not a reg on the circuit and maurice just went for it, classless piece of ****

      
m