Quote:
Originally Posted by Mookman5
1. Joe said that #3, the release of names would be tough, b/c of legal reason (fear of getting sued) and Also moral reasons, not wanting to ruin peoples lives.
So, less than a week in and he's backtracking already?
And I don't usually go in for the moralistic hang-em-and-flog-em stuff at all, but naming people who've systematically cheated their peers doesn't make *you* responsible for ruining their lives. Rather, it holds them responsible for their own actions. What possible reason can anyone have for not wanting to see that happen?
It might damage their reputation in poker circles, but that's hardly akin to ruining their lives, IMO.
Finally, why would Sebok worry about getting sued? Surely we'd be talking about UB naming the names? They've got deep pockets so they can handle the legal fees, they've got the evidence, so they can mount a proper defence.
I can see why they wouldn't want their operations scrutinized in a court of law, mind. But that's just one more reason not to represent them.