Jason Mo on Dwan - Page 8 - Poker News

In my defense, I haven't expressed any opinion whatsoever yet on Durrrr r.e. Mo's accusations. All I said was that Mo isn't necessarily wrong even if he's being kind of an as$hole about it. If we dismissed someone's opinion based on his bankroll, we'd be playing No Limit Argue Em' without table stakes.

Mo does kinda have a point though. It's not good gambling etiquette to make bets for millions of dollars and then sheist out of completing them for a couple years. On the other hand, Durrrr has a deservedly great reputation in the community and has behaved ethically in poker for his entire career (at least that I know of), so I'm guessing he has good reasons. Not to mention FTP imploded for a year, so I'm not grabbing my pitchfork and I'd be comfortable booking a huge bet with Durrrr even though I don't know him at all personally.

I understand, I think everyody sees your point. I just though you were favoring Mo's opinion and I though that it didn't really concern you. Nvm. Gl with the finals.

12-10-2012 , 06:54 PM

#177

ralph cifaretto

adept

Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 770

YOU DON'T KNOW JASON MO?!

IF YOU REMEMBER THE STOX POKER SCAMMER JASON HO, IT'S HIS BROTHER.

12-10-2012 , 06:57 PM

#178

maton808

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,230

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASPoker8

Sauce is pretty much the only one not making an ass of themselves in this thread. lol @ nvg

Why don't you crawl the entire way into his a*s. We can still see your feet!

12-10-2012 , 06:59 PM

#179

LucidDream

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 10,714

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bihzar

I understand, I think everyody sees your point. I just though you were favoring Mo's opinion and I though that it didn't really concern you. Nvm. Gl with the finals.

Why does it concern him any less than it concerns you? Why are you here? You realize this is a forum for discussion right?

12-10-2012 , 07:03 PM

#180

ACEvivKING

banned

Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 1,922

Why is Jason Mo worried about Tom Dwan? Even if he is right about everything keep your mouth shut. He sounds like a jealous 12 year old.

12-10-2012 , 07:20 PM

#181

onebigdummy

adept

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 739

that statement is completely incorrect. discuss at your earliest convenience.

12-10-2012 , 08:10 PM

#182

fees

LAPT San Jose Winner

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 10,627

https://soundcloud.com/djembadjemba/...a-djemba-remix

12-10-2012 , 08:10 PM

#183

ceegee

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 6,551

Quote:

Originally Posted by akyle47

Jason never said that, learn to read

the 2nd tweet...

"here are some truth bombs: @tomdwan won almost all his money online from @guylaiberte playing on a ton of accounts"

I'm not sure if he was saying tom multi accounted or guy multi accounted. I've heard that high stakes player often shared accounts to battle guy though, so I wouldn't be surprised if dwan multi accounted.

12-10-2012 , 08:25 PM

#184

gregorio

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 39,313

read the third tweet and it's obviously Guy is the one with the ton of accounts. plus it's well known guy played on a bunch of accounts including the three biggest losers of all time.

12-10-2012 , 08:27 PM

#185

gregorio

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 39,313

Sounds like Jason has action on jungle in the challenge and is pissed because he won't get paid until it's over. Now that durrrr knows this, I'm sure he'll be in a rush to finish things as to not inconvience Jason any more than he already has.

12-10-2012 , 08:30 PM

#186

King_of_NYC

betting he never calls me again

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 4,380

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregorio

The sarcasm is strong w this one

So, it's ok to multiaccount if you take huge losses?

12-10-2012 , 08:34 PM

#187

needsumthin

self-banned

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,318

Quote:

Originally Posted by ceegee

how is which one of the 2 MA'd really in question here? As has been mentioned and what I thought was widely accepted and understood...Guy has played on many massively losing accounts!

im surprised people with such high post counts arent understanding what Jason Mo meant by the MA tweet!

12-10-2012 , 08:35 PM

#188

omnishakira

High Troller

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 9,732

Quote:

Originally Posted by FullArsenal

LOL wp sir

Also Jason Mo (who the **** is he ?) confirmed mad

12-10-2012 , 09:37 PM

#189

Disorienter

grinder

Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 596

Why do people listen to Obama, he's not the richest man in the US

12-10-2012 , 10:05 PM

#190

Land Of The Free?

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 1,695

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_of_NYC

The sarcasm is strong w this one

So, it's ok to multiaccount if you take huge losses?

Yes, because you're feeding our (not yours, obviously) economy.

12-10-2012 , 10:27 PM

#191

Klakteuh

banned

Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 1,975

Well he isn't wrong about the challenge thing. Haven't seen durr play so can't comment on his skill level. Having that said he hasn't really shined in the last few years at online HUNL.

12-10-2012 , 10:37 PM

#192

HIGHERlevelOFspew

banned

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 440

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klakteuh

Well he isn't wrong about the challenge thing. Haven't seen durr play so can't comment on his skill level. Having that said he hasn't really shined in the last few years at online HUNL.

Um, he hasn't even played (at least on a name that is known to be him) in the last 1 1/2 years online until Nov. lol. Great observation though.

12-10-2012 , 11:11 PM

#193

Klakteuh

banned

Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 1,975

Quote:

Originally Posted by HIGHERlevelOFspew

Um, he hasn't even played (at least on a name that is known to be him) in the last 1 1/2 years online until Nov. lol. Great observation though.

Sorry i forgot last few years = 1.5 years

12-10-2012 , 11:16 PM

#194

amurophil

banned

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 3,972

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_of_NYC

So, it's ok to multiaccount if you take huge losses?

I think 99% of winning players are ok with this

12-10-2012 , 11:23 PM

#195

HIGHERlevelOFspew

banned

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 440

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klakteuh

Sorry i forgot last few years = 1.5 years

Well, a few = 3 (technically) so if he hasn't "played" (which I'd bet he has) in 1.5 years your sample is cut in half instantly. Then you add in that he was dodging Cates for the last few months FTP was around and not really playing anyone else you're down to about 1 year. My points is you're making assumptions out of your as* with no real basis. Is he better than some of the top few HUNL players online now? I don't think he is, but how would anyone really know? Saying he isn't better than 95% or more is absurd.

Haters gonna hate, even with no real basis to do so.

12-10-2012 , 11:24 PM

#196

HIGHERlevelOFspew

banned

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 440

Quote:

Originally Posted by amurophil

I think 99% of winning players are ok with this

I think 100% of everyone is ok with it lol. Doubt FTP went out of their way to ban his accounts with how much they were raking from him.

12-10-2012 , 11:28 PM

#197

angeles

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 1,942

old gray mare aint what she use to be

12-10-2012 , 11:47 PM

#198

maton808

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,230

Quote:

Originally Posted by HIGHERlevelOFspew

I think 100% of everyone is ok with it lol. Doubt FTP went out of their way to ban his accounts with how much they were raking from him.

nosebleeds pay very little rake. He wouldn't be close to one of the top rake payers. They turned a blind eye as he's famous and good for the poker economy.

12-10-2012 , 11:54 PM

#199

HIGHERlevelOFspew

banned

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 440

Quote:

Originally Posted by maton808

nosebleeds pay very little rake. He wouldn't be close to one of the top rake payers. They turned a blind eye as he's famous and good for the poker economy.

I didn't say he was one of the top raked players. No matter what % rake you pay if you lose 20+ million dollars the site isn't going to care one bit about how many accounts you have, famous or not. What do you mean by "nose bleeds pay very little rake." btw? Would they not pay the max amount of rake that the site has? It may not be very much % wise, but I'd assume its $ figure wise maxed out. I don't know honestly so that's why I ask.