Quote:
Originally Posted by PointlessWords
what was the first glaring error you found?
The book is mainly a conceptual book imo. The weakest part of the book is the hand histories but in defense to the authors they only serve to reinforce concepts and are not to be taken at face value.
Conceptually the book is very strong and I enjoyed going through all the chapters. They use qualitative examples instead of quantitative examples which makes sense because it would take a lot longer to write a book using quantitative examples.
If you are looking for how to play a specific hand in a specific spot and be taken through step by step using real data then this isn't the book for you.
If you want to learn broader concepts concerning live play adaptions so that you can apply it to any situation then this book would be highly recommended.