Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUSTtheDRAWCESS
As someone not familiar with this dispute or the parties (I'm not a highstakes player) OP's own description in his OP post where he presumably is defending himself mostly looks like he lied and tried to coverup as much as possible.
Sure maybe the arb decision was bad, but your post doesnt make you look good or ethical.
The arb decision is beyond terrible. He lied about something that's not even relevant. 6k hands from two years prior to the challenge is a mockery. Even if it were 600k hands.
Brandon had no way of proving anything, yet Paint agrees to disregard the initial (favourable for him) arb decision and give Brandon another crack at it. He then admits to the irrelevant lie which he obviously knew would be used against him.
Brandon knew Pinnock was coaching him and didn't care until he lost/was down 48k. He agreed to the original arbiter but then changed his mind when he didn't like his decision. That's the real scam.