Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread)
View Poll Results: Who is gonna win?
Berkey
212 64.05%
"Airball"
119 35.95%

03-28-2023 , 02:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Steer
Is it possible that based on their newly consummated - post-bitch - friendship that Jungleman could be coaching Nik Airball in his Berkey heads up match?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHk2...nel=Airballaji

This could smell major trouble for Berkey.
Jungleman is a genius and a damn poker savant, but I don't think coaching by him would do anyone any good tbh
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 05:44 AM
Unless they play 50k hands or more aren't the results a crapshoot
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 05:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dude45
Unless they play 50k hands or more aren't the results a crapshoot
I was thinking the same thing. Variance is gonna play a massive role,no doubt about that.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 09:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petrucci
I was thinking the same thing. Variance is gonna play a massive role,no doubt about that.
Life is a crapshoot
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 09:28 AM
If you generously estimate they'll get 500 hands/day, that's 7500 hands total.

Somehow I don't believe they'll both make it that far even.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 09:41 AM
How does this benefit Berkey? He was essentially forced to accept the challenge or risk what little remains of his reputation.

At sub 5k hands variance is the real winner here. No max cap also benefits whoever has the largest bankroll, which is likely to be nik.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raisinthehouse
How does this benefit Berkey? He was essentially forced to accept the challenge or risk what little remains of his reputation.

At sub 5k hands variance is the real winner here. No max cap also benefits whoever has the largest bankroll, which is likely to be nik.
if he wins, he gets to keep the money
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 10:09 AM
All poker personalities really are piece of **** arnt they?

Only galfond is likeable. Doug, nik, berkey, Charlie, nick Howard, eqpoker... all insufferable twats.

Don't know why they think it's acceptable to call someone a scammer when they're not. People like that should be shunned nearly as much as those that scam.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 10:15 AM
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by catangod
Why does anybody think Nik, an amateur who's probably a small winner in terribly soft games, will beat Berkey a seasoned pro who?
Because they think Berkey is a scam pro. He has literally no results. Why is he a pro other than the fact that hes promoting himself as one?
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 11:05 AM
Why not play this **** online and two table it. Heads up live is tedious.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 11:07 AM
Because he can say “I flopped top pair” in a 10 minute monologue using made up words?
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 11:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loff
Why not play this **** online and two table it. Heads up live is tedious.
Both competitors think online poker is fake poker because of the total absence of the capability to use real people-based poker skills like psychological operations (winning by intimidation or fake friendliness), strategic trash talk, deliberate use of influential physical mannerisms, reading body language, etc. Basically stuff anti-social hoodie wearing, dark glasses hiding, and ear plug reality denying 5-minute tankers know nothing about.

The only thing I don't like is that it is not livestreamed. They should stream it from a small corner of the Pokergo studio or something.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 03:10 PM
Airhead couldn't beat your local 5/10. Zero ability beyond an overbetting shtick deep against 7 whales that can't hand read.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 03:37 PM
Does Goofball have any HU experience? I doubt he has much, and he also has tilt/spew issues, so for that reason I bet on Berkey. I will bet even odds if anyone wants.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 03:50 PM
i don't care who wins, i just want one of them to blow a million
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 03:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV0995
=
=
Don't know why they think it's acceptable to call someone a scammer when they're not. People like that should be shunned nearly as much as those that scam.
Nik Airball retracted the scammer allegation on Vertucci's podcast.

Other important info from show:

No trust fund or banking job for Airball - all of his money is from HS private games and post-stream games.
Luda Chris wouldn't play on the show unless he could use the masseuse before Vertucci.

Last edited by fadanoid; 03-28-2023 at 04:08 PM.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 04:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Steer
Both competitors think online poker is fake poker because of the total absence of the capability to use real people-based poker skills like psychological operations (winning by intimidation or fake friendliness), strategic trash talk, deliberate use of influential physical mannerisms, reading body language, etc. Basically stuff anti-social hoodie wearing, dark glasses hiding, and ear plug reality denying 5-minute tankers know nothing about.

The only thing I don't like is that it is not livestreamed. They should stream it from a small corner of the Pokergo studio or something.
So they dont actually have any fundamentals
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fadanoid
Nik Airball retracted the scammer allegation on Vertucci's podcast.
Polk also clarified during the Garrett interview that he thinks that Berkey is a fraud but not a scammer.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 04:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dude45
So they dont actually have any fundamentals
They both have strong fundamentals PLUS have very good live psychology skills. This match goes beyond just sizing and frequencies. It also includes face to face mind reading and verbal and visual influence.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 04:25 PM
An argument can be made that Berkey has “strong” fundamentals.

I’d struggle to take seriously the opinion of someone arguing that Nik has them.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loff
Why not play this **** online and two table it. Heads up live is tedious.
Why don't they just play the superbowl on Madden.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-28-2023 , 08:36 PM
03-28-2023 , 10:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV0995
All poker personalities really are piece of **** arnt they?

Only galfond is likeable. Doug, nik, berkey, Charlie, nick Howard, eqpoker... all insufferable twats.

Don't know why they think it's acceptable to call someone a scammer when they're not. People like that should be shunned nearly as much as those that scam.
Berkey has tried the same **** to get Hellmuth to play him so **** Berkey trying to claim he’s victim, I hope he gets cleaned out.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote
03-29-2023 , 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raisinthehouse
How does this benefit Berkey? He was essentially forced to accept the challenge or risk what little remains of his reputation.

At sub 5k hands variance is the real winner here. No max cap also benefits whoever has the largest bankroll, which is likely to be nik.
Actually this is a good point, because nick can always push the run-good variance by always covering berkey. However this can quickly turn into a martingale type situation if berkey manages to string together some wins in a row in one session, because he can always reset the next day after 6.5 hours. Berkey will always be playing near minimum on his losing sessions, whereas nik will always be playing near maximum. And at the end of the day if they end up 1 mil deep or something because berkey doubles up a few times, the most nik can win once he gets berkey’s whole stack is 100k (assuming berkey always buys the min and never tops up). It behooves berkey to never try to cover nik and stick to a strict only top up if felted/near felted if he wants to reduce variance.
Heads up between Nik Airball and Solve For Why Matt Berkey & others (NA HU containment thread) Quote

      
m