The person 2 posts above mine goes by the name justiceforgman, that is who I was talking about.

I did not mean to insinuate I meant Garrett.

Keno… cmon bud… you gotta try harder than that!

The question wasn't addressed to you. Butt out.

I know, and that's part of the problem. Not that you think there's a shill campaign - that's not a problem, it's obviously your right to hold that opinion. But that you can't believe everyone else doesn't see it the same way is the mindset that a small but vocal subset of 2+2ers have which drives numerous threads into unreadability. Simple disagreements don't work for that subset; anyone who isn't fully on board with their point of view is a shill, or a troll, defending someone, etc., etc.

If we were to take all issues like this we've seen on 2+2 and add up the number of actual paid shills posting in any of them, I'd be very surprised if that number is not many times lower than what people of that mindset think it is. Does this thread have shills posting in it? No idea. A concerted shill campaign? I suppose that's possible, but it seems unlikely to me. I think you're heavily overestimating the importance of this thread. But I don't know for certain, and certainly can't prove it, so it's a point on which we'll have to agree to disagree.

This isn't a question of logic. It is my opinion that by arguing ad nauseum with the same people, and constantly mud slinging with them, you are very much helping them derail the thread, whether that's their purpose here or not. Clearly you hold a different opinion, but I don't see anything illogical about mine.

To be clear, I've never suggested you shouldn't ever engage with those you view as shills. This is the post I started this exchange with:

What I was suggesting to you was problematic was going back and forth with the same people over and over again; the trading of attacks, name calling, and bickering. It's a lot of noise that makes the thread unreadable, and discourages people not involved in said exchanges from reading the thread. It's certainly kept me away for most of it, and I doubt I'm the only one.

Yes, I am making a point, just not one about the cheating accusations. That doesn't mean I'm living in any particular person's/side's world.

I understand your position. The problem is that I'm taking this line out of necessity. These shills are launching an effective disinformation campaign, and it's costing a large amount of money. Nobody would put that money toward this if they didn't believe it to be effective, and the fact that there are people who deny it's existence proves it's effectiveness. I am aware that what I'm doing is making people mad at me, but the consequences of not doing this will contribute to the scammers achieving victory. I'm sorry if I haven't handled the situation perfectly. I never said I was perfect. I want to eliminate this scam, and I'm doing what I think is necessary to achieve that goal.

I don't remember that call. Everything I write is just my opinion. By the way, I believe that Robbi will end up with much more than $135k of Garret's roll, by the time the dust settles on this nasty accusation. Remember the USA is the home of Litigation.

Keno… Keno… Keno… you really need to find a new angle.

How do I say I’m ignoring him without telling I’m ignoring him?
Oh

The irony of shills accusing others of being shills. The only disinformation campaign has come from Garrett and his shills who have done everything they can for months to portray an innocent person as a cheat. its scary how deluded you are. This is literal flat earth territory now.

Ya, me and bobo are cool though. Air is cleared between us. Keep trying to pretend I'm insane though, you're losing legitimacy faster than you realize.

Yes because your side has so much legitimacy after being debunked by literally everything right? lul. I like I said, scary delusion level.

This is a great psychological insight into the mind of conspiracy theorists though. They find every excuse to dismiss any evidence that counters their delusional opinion. The lie detector was apparently bogus, and so was the 100k forensic investigation by an extremely credible organization. Exact same system the flat earthers use. Fascinating stuff.

The sick thing is that it's going to cost way less than 100k to prove the entire thing is a scam lol. Shows how desperate your side is. I offered negotiation too, ask that moron who decided to call out Robbi.

lol indeed

Ya, my buddy loves to exaggerate. I'm the opposite. Maybe that's why we work well together.

Credit where it’s due: This was a pretty awesome response.

I think Robbi started playing on pokerstars

UTG: 24,204 (242 bb)
MP: 4,191 (42 bb)
MP+1 (Hero): 9,990 (100 bb)
CO: 10,275 (103 bb)
BU: 11,060 (111 bb)
SB: 9,860 (99 bb)
BB: 10,420 (104 bb)

Pre-Flop: (220) Hero is MP+1 with A♥ 9♥
2 players fold, Hero raises to 250, 2 players fold, SB calls 200, BB calls 150

Flop: (820) 7♥ 2♥ 8♠ (3 players)
SB checks, BB bets 820, Hero calls 820, SB calls 820

Turn: (3,280) 4♥ (3 players)
SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets 1,600, SB calls 1,600, BB folds

River: (6,480) 5♦ (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets 7,310 (all-in), SB calls 7,180 (all-in)

Total pot: 20,840

Showdown:
MP+1 (Hero) shows A♥ 9♥ (a flush, Ace high)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 70%, Flop: 73%, Turn: 100%, River: 100%)

SB shows 9♣ T♥ (high card, Ten)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 30%, Flop: 27%, Turn: 0%, River: 0%)

MP+1 (Hero) wins 20,840

Wow villain only beats 93…

Has to be a misclick/read

going for the ocean card obviously.

But they had the blocker

They put the guy on ace high

Huh

And they do it all the time... even live and off-stream.

I wouldn't not disagree.