Did anyone here have their mind changed now that the report is out?

Seems like no one itt moved at all.

The report was literally inconclusive lol.

https://hustlercasinolive.com/j4report/

Well they did conclude that HCL had virtually no security measures in place and that the easiest and most effective method of cheating, that would also leave very little to no evidence behind, was entirely possible at the time of the incident and before.

The report concludes she could have cheated, though they have found no evidence to confirm either way.

They found no evidence?

Shocker

Generally what happens when you investigate yourself. Nope everything seems absolutely fine here captain feather sword.


Meanwhile…

Yeah it seems that the report was found to be inconclusive and no direct evidence of cheating.

Two things you need to keep in mind, the report found a very high risk of cheating and it is likely to happen.

The investigation started 15 days AFTER suspected cheating.

Draw your own conclusions.

Well if that’s true saying you had very little security measures really isn’t the best look

But no evidence on Robbi, I’m shocked.

Long Version.....I made this post when the incident was first shown. I have not yet seen any definitive proof or admission to change my mind about Robbi. A boat load of conspiracies and twists and turns, but no definitive proof. " I am definitely not in the same league as the players at that table, or probably most of the people commenting here. But, if she did cheat I have yet to see anyone say how she did it. As many have said she is probably playing out of her ability level in this game. I think she simply misread either her hand, or the exposed cards, managed to get herself confused and got very lucky at the end. If there turns out to be proof of cheating, then she will suffer the consequences. Having said that if after the investigation, there is no proof of any wrong doing, I hope that those of you who have accused her will have the decency to apologize to her loudly and publicly. " .....I told you.

There was the AQ vs AQ hand where they flopped trips and check. On the turn, Rip is pointing to the corner of his shoulder, he then squeals out a weird "eeek," looks at Robbi and shakes his head no. The report said that while they appeared to communicate, they found no evidence that they were sharing information about their hand.

So that's a relief. I originally thought they were softplaying, but since the release of the report, it's apparent Rip was just signalling that he didn't want boom boom tonight and just wanted to be held.

You sir flopped the nuts and then slowplayed it till the river. Well played

Eric and Haralabob better keep their fingers to themselves tonight ...

From the report:

"The undisclosed financial relationship between Ms. Lew and Mr. Chavez could have created the appearance of possible collusion between the two players. Such conduct is widely considered unethical in the poker community and is prohibited in “Hustler Casino Live” games. In order to clarify that point, all players are now required to sign a waiver agreeing that they do not have arrangements to share their profit with other players in the game."


Robbi, sooo sorry that you softplayed and engaged in what is considered unethical and prohibited behavior.

It's only cheating if one guy isn't in on it.

FMP

Lol no one cares about softplaying in a heads up pot

J4, any evidence?

Says who? Soft playing in a heads up pot is called colluding, therefore it’s cheating.

So by your own ignorance robbi did in fact cheat.

J4 hand there’s no direct evidence to say she cheated during this hand. There are 7 ways that she could have cheated identified by “bulletproof” but the results were inconclusive, generally what happens when you do your own investigation 15 days after suspected cheating.


I will also note, not once was the deck ever inspected. The deck was not inspected by the company at all. This is weird.

Why wasn’t the shuffling machine bolted to the table? Why wasn’t the machine inspected?

Why wasn’t the deck inspected?

Why wasn’t the shuffling machine shuffling during hands and instead showing a red light?

I feel like this report being inconclusive is a smoke screen, funnily enough the director of the company followed our discord directly after the investigation. A man that has just finished investigation snap follows us after his?

Seems like he may be interested to see our findings. Why is that?

Except HCL didn’t investigate themselves, they hired an outside investigator.

deleted my post. I made a small joke about them hoping that brian doesn't come back from the grave, but it didn't sit well with me.

It's kind of disturbing what happened there and that it appears nobody knows where he's at, or even cares. . .

And robbie hired an outside lie detector guy.?
When you pay the investigators, they usually investigate how you tell them to investigate and find what you hope for them to find.
An independent investigator hired by the casino would probably have done a better job, especially if they came in right away and had access to bryan.

This is std in private and higher stakes games and not unethical. To call it unethical is unethical

I thought we've been talking about the report that said it was considered unethical and was prohibited?

Constantly.