Has the first sentence been verified, if so source?

I’d bet NO ONE believes the second sentence. That’s she’s ahead in high stakes cash. I’m counting home games assuming she has history in them.

Nick shaking his head no while saying he'll release any camera footage that comes out lol.

In the first session Robbi played a woman sat down in seat 4 like 2 hours in and asked if the stream was going yet?

In the second session a hand is being dealt (Robbi and Garrett are dealt in) as the stream cuts off and they keep playing.

In others words it’s possible that either one of them could be mistaken on when exactly the stream begins and ends

So a few second proof they did play off stream. Even if it was just a few hands if some wants to argue semantics: Garrett never said they didn’t play together off stream did he?

The thing in Robs pants is in no way debunked. She obviously has something there, that would very well fit a bluetooth tens unit. Which would also explain the vibrations and muscle contractions. None of this is debunked or even fringe. It is clear on camera.

Doesn't matter its still an extremely odd thing for her to say in that particular moment. By saying it she's implying what, that she made some sick hero J high call previous that no one has seen?

Am I the only one missing the absurdity of this or am I misremembering?

I think you simply put YOUTUBE in square brackets at the beginning and /YOUTUBE in square brackets at the end, with the weird code the only thing in the middle.

I will see if this works and then you can click Quote on this post to see exactly what I posted.



Did that work?

The poster’s point I replied to was to show another instance of her lying.

I was questioning if even Garrett said not true.

I was able to edit mine and link it correctly. Thanks!

Like this.

The Who fan? Isn’t everyone?

KJo - raises in bb after Garrett folds
75o - folds utg
T2o - folds after Garrett raises
T4o - folds after Eric raises and Garrett 3 bets
Js8s - fold pre in cutoff? after Eric raises 72o utg and Garrett folds
XX - Folds after Garrett folds
T3o - folds utg
Q2o - folds
52o - folds
Th5h - folds
52o - folds
95o - folds
Q5o - folds
QhJh - calls raise from Eric - Garrett folds - bets small when ahead smiles at Eric after flop bet - incorrectly snap checks river.
22 - folds on button after G folds
AA
98o - folds pre after Garrett raises
85o - folds after Garrett folds
AKo - raises utg - 3 bet by Eric Ah8h with Garrett behind who folds
XX - folds pre after Garret never see her cards only backs of cards
AQo - Garrett folds pre
4h3h - folds pre in sb Eric raises we never see his cards - Garrett folds pre
83o - folds pre after Garrett folds pre
A9o - folds pre facing utg raise from Garrett
Q3o - folds utg
XX - folds pre- after Garrett folds
Qh3h folds pre - after Garrett folds ($200 blind)
JcTc calls raise pre - after Garrett folds
85o folds pre - after Garrett raises
96o looks like she considers calling then folds utg - after hand RIP & Robbi looks
9s3s calls Rys raise last blind-G folds - bets incorrectly into top pair on riv/loses
- "That is why you do not play the hand I played"-smacks hand-seems genuine
Robbi 20% VPIP shown on screen after this hand !!!
Jd8d hand - Eric gets up right after cards dealt - first time Robbi makes bizarre call with anything- Hanson Robbi calls with J8?! Robbi time bank folds river (correctly) with jack high after saying she thinks Garrett is bluffing. Eric adjusting his hat over his ears when he returns. I believe this is the first time we see Eric in his hat.
93o - folds pre after G folds
KK - G folds before she acts pre. Robbi loses 40k vs AJ AIPF. She's now up about 60k.
Ah5h - calls raise in a blind pre - G folds - incorrectly folds flop to Eric
AQo - Garrett folds before reaching her - RIP colludes to protect her stack
---------Dealer Change-----------
J2o - folds when it's folded around to hj - G folds before it gets to her
--------New straddle round starts---------
Js3s hand - open limps utg with Garrett in big blind
J4o - calls $2600 in last blind to go hu with Garrett to flop.

Robbi's pre-flop considering Garrett action^^^

If any of this is inaccurate, let me know and I can edit it. I threw in some game events that took place right before the final hands. Not that the actions prior to that are irrelevant, I just don't have them.

The accusation is that she may be looking for a spot to win a big all-in against Garrett at some point, she won a quick 100k in the session and Garrett is very deep.

Main takeaway for me is the tight hand selection prior to the straddle round that ended the game. Very out of character for Robbi to be involved with JX imo. J3s UTG? Wtf is that about?

She's just that good and outplayed Garrett, obviously no cheating happened and shes a genius poker player, nothing sus at all. the 15k swiped from her stack just coincidence and unlucky obiously.

Is J high is a bluff catcher?
Still haven't heard a good explanation for asking if he can beat a 3,if she knows she only has J high.
If anything the word when she's embarrassed,realising she has misread her hand means less then her comments before she calls.
Players with as little experience as she has,often aren't able to properly explain there thought processes, especially in a spot like that

I'm not saying fishing for information is accurate (I think it is and her follow up chatter supports this) but you're either a shill or a troll pretending this hasn't been asked and answered 50 times already.

Weird the Garrett simps like this guy need to keep making things up to help there case

Haralabob: Robbi was it harder to pass the lie detector test or to get away with cheating on Hustler Casino Live?

Also Haralabob:


Hes seemed to be pretty heavy on the she cheated boat. So why play on HCL tonight then?

*their

People seem to be giving the golden boy,a pass for the many lies he's told throughout this,including his initial statement about not asking for the money back and in his full page write up in here.
Almost half of his conspiracies and comments about other people have been proven false

People ask if they can beat bottom pair all the time trying to gauge if they have or can beat A high etc. Its a lame attempt at trying to get the opponent to think you have it. Its meaningless.

She has zero reaction when tabling J4. Once again, she is asked IMMEDIATELY after calling by Andy if she has 33 "no" then if she has a 3 "no this is...I have a pure bluff catcher". Why do people keep ignoring this or explaining it away? There is ZERO reason to lie here because the action is complete & everyone will know her cards whether she tables them or not.

Didn't he say he was playing 5k/10k the other day? He bought in for10k tonight he will be okay.

Who cares what Harlalabob thinks & what at all does it have to do w/ the case? Nothing. More noise.

Right right right. We’re treated to more than two weeks of a non-stop barrage, 24/7 astroturfing from shill accounts. Than a silence of a couple of hours out of nowhere, then a return of the shills en masse. Their explanation? More gaslighting. What you witnessed isn’t what you witnessed at all!

Ty, your efforts here doesn't go unnoticed sir.
I must improve my spelling if I'm to continue my career shilling,by the way can anyone tell me when and how I get paid for my work here?

Robbi would disagree with you. She said a misread with the 3 caused her to call. Never heard anyone interchange a misread to imply great skill.

Wait, was that before or after she said she called with jack high because she felt Garrett had ace high?

Maybe Robbi believed she had 10k instead of 100k? I can be her new manager to create new lies for her but I’m very expensive.

Perhaps I’m misremembering this, but after Robbi made the comment about Garrett letting her do this to him offstream as well, didn’t Garret respond something to the likes of, “But we’ve never played off stream”?